Category:Environmental Security: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:




<big><font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ </font></big>
<big><font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font></big>




Line 32: Line 32:




:<big><font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font></big> <big><font color=green>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font></big>
:·······························································································
 
 
; <big><big>'''''Undercutting Security:'''''</big></big>
:<big><big>'''''US Congress Moves to Cutback Essential Science'''''</big></big>
 
 
[[File:EarthRightNow Earth Science satellite fleet circa 2015 m.jpg]]
 
 
<big>'''''Politics & Lobbying: Damaging to the Earth Science Mission'''''</big>
 
 
[[Climate News]]
 
[[Earth and Space, Politics]]
 
 
*'''''http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics'''''
 
*'''''http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Climate_News'''''
 
 
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ku6rhdmbF4 <big>'''''U.S. Congress/Science Committee's 'War on Science''''''</big>]
 
 
*[http://strategicdemands.com/priorities-skew-away-from-nasa-and-security/ '''''Strategic Demands: Republican Priorities Skew Away from NASA & Security''''']
 
*[http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/05/01/house-science-committee-guts-nasa-earth-sciences-budget/ '''''House Science Committee Guts Earth Sciences Budget''''']
 
*[http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/05/01/anti-science-gop-eviscerates-nasa-spending-climate-change-research '''''Anti-Science GOP 'Eviscerates' NASA Spending on Climate Change Research''''']
 
 
○
 
 
'''''Lobbyists and Caucus that doesn't want NASA studying Earth...'''''
 
''http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/04/30/proposed-massive-cuts-to-nasa-earth-science-budget-draw-protest/''
 
 
'''''GOP Attacks Earth Science At NASA, Climate Change Research In Peril'''''
 
''Phil Plait: [http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/04/30/nasa_budget_gop_committee_wants_to_slash_and_burn_earth_sciences.html There’s no other way to put this], so I’ll be succinct: A passel of anti-science global warming denying GOP representatives have put together a funding authorization bill for NASA that at best cuts more than $300 million from the agency’s current Earth science budget. At worst? More than $500 million.''
 
''In an op-ed in The Hill, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Texas, wrote that the GOP members of the committee didn't even give the writeup of the bill to Democrats on the committee until very late last week, indicating the GOP members are not operating in good faith on this issue.''
 
 
○
 
 
''Rep. Eddie Johnson: Despite the fact that in January NASA announced 2014 was likely the warmest year since 1880, it should come as no surprise that the majority wants to cut funding for climate science. Embarrassingly, just last week, every single Republican member of this committee present voted against the notion that climate change might be caused by people.''
 
○
 
 
''Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Md.)''''': '''''[T]he bill puts at risk 10,000 jobs at [https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/home/index.html Goddard] and would have “huge, deep, lasting” impacts... “I will not stand by quietly and enable that to happen.”''
 
:''Rep Donna F Edwards ‏@repdonnaedwards  Apr 30''
''(2/2) My amendment to restore half a billion dollars in @NASA #EarthScience cuts defeated along party lines.''
 
:''Rep Donna F Edwards ‏@repdonnaedwards  Apr 30''
''Disappointed that @HouseScience Committee leadership passed a partisan bill today which guts @NASA #EarthScience programs. (1/2)''
 
○
 
 
[[File:EarthRightNow Earth Science @work via 2014-2015 NASA launches m.png]]
 
 
[https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/05/01/statement-ostp-director-john-p-holdren-house-proposed-funding-cuts-nasas-critical-ea '''Re: funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs''']
 
 
On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:
 
''"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do '''serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced.'''''
 
''The bill’s cuts to space-technology development would not only risk continued U.S leadership in the space industry, but would also impede progress on precisely those technologies—on-orbit refueling, advanced space propulsion, radiation protection in deep space, and more—needed to make crewed missions to deep space a reality. In the absence of robust investments to bring these technologies into being, the goal of sending U.S. astronauts to Mars in the 2030s could be in jeopardy.''
 
''The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth” — the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space.''
 
''NASA’s mission to observe, understand, and explore the solar system and the cosmos beyond has long been matched in importance by its mission to use the unrivaled vantage point of Earth orbit for looking downward, to better understand the only home that humanity currently has. It is difficult to understand why, at this time of U.S. leadership in both the outward-facing and inward-facing facets of NASA’s operations in space, the Congress would want to undermine that leadership and sacrifice the panoply of benefits it brings to the Nation."''
 
 
[[File:House budget see earth science.jpg]]
 
 
[[File:Presidents budget see earth science.jpg]]
 
 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




Line 143: Line 53:
* Environmental Security as a recent element of earth exploration — earth systems/resources observation/monitoring by newly formed “New Space” companies and next generation earth-facing satellites. Planet APIs are being developed — the results of new ways of seeing will change concepts of citizenship.
* Environmental Security as a recent element of earth exploration — earth systems/resources observation/monitoring by newly formed “New Space” companies and next generation earth-facing satellites. Planet APIs are being developed — the results of new ways of seeing will change concepts of citizenship.


[http://www.planetcitizen.org '''PlanetCitizen''']
 
<big>'''[[PlanetCitizen]]'''</big>
 


The Internet-enabled world is connecting billions and "digital citizens" who are being connected and experiencing a networked, interactive world in new ways that are redrawing old orthodoxies and traditional points of view. A 360° global perspective is presenting new opportunities and challenges as the trend toward engagement with knowledge delivered via 'the Net' gathers momentum and accelerates.
The Internet-enabled world is connecting billions and "digital citizens" who are being connected and experiencing a networked, interactive world in new ways that are redrawing old orthodoxies and traditional points of view. A 360° global perspective is presenting new opportunities and challenges as the trend toward engagement with knowledge delivered via 'the Net' gathers momentum and accelerates.
Line 156: Line 68:




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-


·······································································




Line 164: Line 76:




; <big><big>"A 360° Perspective"</big></big>
<big>'''[[Planet Citizens]]'''</big>


; <big><big>"New Definitions of National Security"</big></big>
 
<big><big>'''"A 360° Perspective"'''</big></big>
 
<big>'''"New Definitions of National Security"'''</big></big>


'''Environmental Security ↔ National Security ↔ Global Security'''  
'''Environmental Security ↔ National Security ↔ Global Security'''  


[http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/New_Definitions_of_National_Security '''New Definitions of National and Global Security''']


[http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/ '''Environmental Security''']
* [http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/New_Definitions_of_National_Security '''New Definitions of National and Global Security''']
 
* [http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/ '''Environmental Security''']
 
* [http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Climate_News '''Climate Change News''']


[http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Climate_News '''Climate Change News''']
* [http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Right_Now '''Earth Right Now''']


[http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Right_Now '''Earth Right Now''']
* [http://strategicdemands.com/security-design/ '''Security Design''']


[http://strategicdemands.com/security-design/ '''Security Design''']
* [http://strategicdemands.com/stratdem-factoid-re-road-security/ '''Road to Security''']


[http://strategicdemands.com/stratdem-factoid-re-road-security/ '''Road to Security''']




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
·······································································




Revision as of 19:51, 19 February 2018

<addthis />


EnvirSecurity.png


ThinBlue.png . EnvironmentalSecurity ThinBlue.png


Security Horizon: Strategic Demands

Planet Citizens, Planet Science

Climate News @GreenPolicy


The Commons


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Earth Science

Earth Science research from space: an essential role in overall security policy

Earth-facing satellite programs: "mission critical"... protecting national/global security


·······························································································


Environmental Security to Advance National Security

GreenPolicy360, in association with Strategic Demands, visualizes "Environmental Security" as a critical field of global concern, study and development.


  • Environmental Security Integrally Connected to National Security --
https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security,_National_Security


Our work focuses on three strategic currents:

  • Environmental Security as a field enabled by the rapidly developing Internet, connecting and bringing together 'netizens', science and political ideas which are newly defining and developing security concepts, objectives and goals
  • Environmental Security as an interdisciplinary scientific venture — a challenge for traditional disciplines as global climate change/global warming, biosphere sustainability and related threat environments demand solutions across national borders and scientific fields of study
  • Environmental Security as a recent element of earth exploration — earth systems/resources observation/monitoring by newly formed “New Space” companies and next generation earth-facing satellites. Planet APIs are being developed — the results of new ways of seeing will change concepts of citizenship.


PlanetCitizen


The Internet-enabled world is connecting billions and "digital citizens" who are being connected and experiencing a networked, interactive world in new ways that are redrawing old orthodoxies and traditional points of view. A 360° global perspective is presenting new opportunities and challenges as the trend toward engagement with knowledge delivered via 'the Net' gathers momentum and accelerates.

It is the considered opinion of GreenPolicy360, as we explore #topics and #keyphrases such as #Earth360 #PlanetCitizen #EarthPOV and link the integral ecology of #environmentalsecurity to #nationalsecurity, that we are advancing a field of study and a field that will change the way 'national security' has defined over centuries.

A multi-lateral, multi-dimensioned world is in the process of coming to be -- and the concept of defining 'new definitions of national security' and 'green best practices' is at the center of our policy concerns.

We urge — “strategically demand” — #EarthMonitoring and #EarthScience to be ‘rapidly deployed’ to critically assess, evaluate and provide policy recommendations for essential planetary #EnvironmentalSecurity and resulting #NationalSecurity.

Recent scientific studies of varying urgency have demonstrated a wide range of threats to local/regional/national/international environments. ‘Existential’ questions have become a first-order priority of concern rising to action-demanded status among traditional, historic security concerns.


·······································································


New Definitions of National Security.png


Planet Citizens


"A 360° Perspective"

"New Definitions of National Security"

Environmental Security ↔ National Security ↔ Global Security



·······································································


Earth-science.png

Subcategories

This category has the following 58 subcategories, out of 58 total.

A

B

C

E

F

G

I

  • IOT‎ (2 C, 3 P, 12 F)

N

O

P

R

S

T

U

W

Pages in category "Environmental Security"

The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 214 total.

(previous page) (next page)

3

@

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

L

M

N

O

P

R

S

T

(previous page) (next page)

Media in category "Environmental Security"

The following 200 files are in this category, out of 1,547 total.

(previous page) (next page)(previous page) (next page)
Retrieved from "https://greenpolicy360.net/index.php?title=Category:Environmental_Security&oldid=65819"