Category:Nuclear Nonproliferation: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<addthis />
 




::::[[File:Nuclear plutonium pit.jpg]]
::::[[File:Nuclear plutonium pit.jpg]]
:::: '''[[Nuclear Weapons]]'''
::::* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons
<big><big>'''2023'''</big></big>




GreenPolicy360: The work of Greg Mitchell is exceptional on multiple fronts -- two of the biggest topics he brings to us in vivid color are rock 'n roll history and then there are those nuclear weapons that the 1960s saw with the immediacy of the 'the End' (i.e. the nuclear close call of the Cuban Missile Crisis, not the Doors song.)


<big><big><big><font color=green>'''2022'''</font></big></big></big>
Greg Mitchell took a look this week at one of most controversial and important figures in American history, Dan Ellsberg of Pentagon Papers fame, and Greg reminded his readers that Dan was a nuclear war planner before he was asked by Robert McNamara to do a history of the Vietnam war. "The Doomsday Machine", the book Dan wrote several years before his recent death is placed under the spotlight by Mitchell and he informs us that a movie is now in development.
 
We asked Greg if we could republish what he wrote because it is essential reading, again and again. Take a look at what Mitchell is saying, and do consider signing up for his ongoing work via his Substack subscription. Greg is a unique voice in American life. 
 
 
○
 
 
'''First, news about a new documentary based on Dan Ellsberg's award-winning book,''' '''''"The Doomsday Machine"'''''.
 
* https://oppenheimer2023.substack.com/p/kristin-stewart-promotes-new-film
 
 
[[File:PBS Documentary - Movement and the Madman 6.png]]
 
<small>* https://greenpolicy360.net/w/File:PBS_Documentary_-_Movement_and_the_Madman_6.png</small>
 
 
 
○




Line 21: Line 49:


<big><big><big>[https://strategicdemands.com/a-proposed-ukraine-fix-act-now-to-expand-the-inf-agreement/ '''Strategic Demands for Mutual Security, Not Yet Evident''']</big></big></big>
<big><big><big>[https://strategicdemands.com/a-proposed-ukraine-fix-act-now-to-expand-the-inf-agreement/ '''Strategic Demands for Mutual Security, Not Yet Evident''']</big></big></big>
Updated / First week of February 2022




Line 42: Line 68:




▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲  
:: ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 




Latest revision as of 16:09, 31 January 2024


Nuclear plutonium pit.jpg
Nuclear Weapons


2023


GreenPolicy360: The work of Greg Mitchell is exceptional on multiple fronts -- two of the biggest topics he brings to us in vivid color are rock 'n roll history and then there are those nuclear weapons that the 1960s saw with the immediacy of the 'the End' (i.e. the nuclear close call of the Cuban Missile Crisis, not the Doors song.)

Greg Mitchell took a look this week at one of most controversial and important figures in American history, Dan Ellsberg of Pentagon Papers fame, and Greg reminded his readers that Dan was a nuclear war planner before he was asked by Robert McNamara to do a history of the Vietnam war. "The Doomsday Machine", the book Dan wrote several years before his recent death is placed under the spotlight by Mitchell and he informs us that a movie is now in development.

We asked Greg if we could republish what he wrote because it is essential reading, again and again. Take a look at what Mitchell is saying, and do consider signing up for his ongoing work via his Substack subscription. Greg is a unique voice in American life.


○


First, news about a new documentary based on Dan Ellsberg's award-winning book, "The Doomsday Machine".


PBS Documentary - Movement and the Madman 6.png

* https://greenpolicy360.net/w/File:PBS_Documentary_-_Movement_and_the_Madman_6.png


○


Nuclear Weapons Threat Remains a Highest Concern

Will Russia-US-NATO-Ukraine-Germany-UK-France-Euro Negotiations Produce Offramp, or Bring Conflict?
Dangers of War, Miscalculation, Mistake Run Deep


Strategic Demands - Featured Pages.png


Strategic Demands for Mutual Security, Not Yet Evident


Bigger Picture Beyond the Ukraine Conflict

A Proposed Ukraine Fix: Act Now to Expand the INF Agreement
Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, NATO, EU, US


Posted January 19, 29; February 6 | By Strategic Demands Online


▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


Doomsday Clock - 2022.png


StratDem logo4.png


Nuclear Proliferation vs Nuclear Nonproliferation

In the Nuclear Age the Question of the Hour...Day...Year...Century is.... Security


Begin at the Beginning, the National Lab Birthplace of The Bomb
Reporting About the 'Lab on the Hill' from the Los Alamos Study Group (LASG)
News of the Center, the Pits, Cores, the Triggers, Designers & US Nuclear Weapons


Los Alamos Study Group

Over three decades of public interest, nuclear nonproliferation work
* http://www.lasg.org/press/PressReleases.html


Los Alamos Study Group - 2021 cont..png


LASG Nuclear Report-SJS May 9, 2018.png


▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


Nuclear Nonproliferation


Two Minutes to Midnight / @ Strategic Demands


Thirty-seconds-closer-to-midnight.png


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ


Nuclear warhead - 2009 - Conf on Disarmament.jpg


Nuclear Weapons Proliferation v. Nonproliferation


Historic Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons Opens for Signature at United Nations


Via LASG / Treaty comprehensively bans nuclear weapons research, possession, use, deterrence, and all forms of assistance in these prohibited acts

Around 45 nations expected to sign by September 20: Treaty 'entry into force' follows 50th ratification


Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons Adopted

July 7, 2017 / UN conference adopts treaty banning nuclear weapons


ReachingCriticalWill-July7,2017-2.png


 

● http://www.lasg.org/press/2017/press_release_7Jul2017.html
Nuclear Ban Treaty 7-7-2017 12-33-35 PM.png


Draft Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons / July 5


▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


To Ban -- or Not To Ban


June 2017

Status of the Nuclear Weapons Ban Negotiations

For many years the editor of Strategic Demands has continued an association with the Los Alamos Study Group/LASG. Their team of scientists and public/civil representatives continues to address critical issues involving US nuclear weapons development. Currently at the UN, the LASG is reporting on the historic "Convention to Prohibit Nuclear Weapons".

Read about this historic UN nuclear disarmament conference via Strategic Demands.

Blissfully-Unaware.png


March 2017

World Nations Gather in Unprecedented Meeting to Ban Nuclear Weapons

http://www.lasg.org/BAN/BAN_open.html
http://www.icanw.org/campaign-news/report-on-the-march-negotiations/ -- http://reachingcriticalwill.org/news/latest-news/11400-un-concludes-productive-first-week-of-nuclear-weapon-ban-treaty-negotiations
http://reachingcriticalwill.org/news/latest-news/11763-npt-preparatory-committee-concludes


● Negotiating a global nuclear ban treaty: Nuclear-armed states vs the UN

https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050/rebecca-johnson/negotiating-global-nuclear-ban-treaty-nuclear-armed-states-versus-un


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ


December 2016

In Historic Vote, UN General Assembly Mandates 2017 Negotiations to Ban Research, Development, Testing, Stockpiling, Use of Nuclear Weapons

“Most significant nuclear disarmament development since Cold War”


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ


October 27, 2016

The United Nations today adopted a landmark resolution to launch negotiations in 2017 on a treaty outlawing nuclear weapons. This historic decision heralds an end to two decades of paralysis in multilateral nuclear disarmament efforts.

At a meeting of the First Committee of the UN General Assembly, which deals with disarmament and international security matters, 123 nations voted in favour of the resolution, with 38 against and 16 abstaining.

The resolution will set up a UN conference beginning in March next year, open to all member states, to negotiate a “legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons, leading towards their total elimination”. The negotiations will continue in June and July.


Nuclear Ban vote ILPI Oct 27,2016.jpg


The ‘No’ votes came from the nuclear weapons states, and U.S. allies in NATO, plus Japan, South Korea and Australia, which have treaty ties to the U.S., and consider themselves to be under the protection of the ‘U.S. nuclear umbrella.’


◊


Negotiating a global nuclear ban treaty: nuclear-armed states vs the UN

● https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050/rebecca-johnson/negotiating-global-nuclear-ban-treaty-nuclear-armed-states-versus-un

● http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Nonproliferation

Nuclear Issues.png


● http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/


◊


A 'Modernized' Nuclear Arsenal

US Continues a 'Trillion-Dollar' Upgrade to Nuclear Arms and Delivery Systems

● http://strategicdemands.com/new-nuclear-arsenal/


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ


● http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-hair-trigger/


Hair trigger.png


(See Archives; Subcategories; Categories; Pages; Database)

Subcategories

This category has the following 7 subcategories, out of 7 total.

G

N

P

S

Media in category "Nuclear Nonproliferation"

The following 200 files are in this category, out of 225 total.

(previous page) (next page)(previous page) (next page)
Retrieved from "https://greenpolicy360.net/index.php?title=Category:Nuclear_Nonproliferation&oldid=116027"