File:Climate diplomacy is failing - June 2020.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:




Even ‘climate progressive’ nations fall far short of Paris Agreement targets
''Alex Steffen / University of Manchester Report''


New research focusing on the UK and Sweden, demonstrates just how far even ‘climate progressive’ nations are from meeting our international commitments to avoid dangerous climate change.


The researchers concluded that despite the UK and Sweden claiming to have world leading climate legislation, their planned reductions in emissions will still lead to total emissions two to three times greater than is their fair share of a Paris-compliant global carbon budget.
<big>''Even ‘climate progressive’ nations fall far short of Paris Agreement targets''</big>


The annual rate that emissions are expected to be cut is less than half of that required, with the scientists suggesting a minimum for the UK of 10% each year, starting in 2020. Similarly, the date of achieving a fully zero-carbon energy system should be around 2035, rather than the UK’s current ‘net-zero’ by 2050 legislation.
''New research focusing on the UK and Sweden, demonstrates just how far even ‘climate progressive’ nations are from meeting our international commitments to avoid dangerous climate change.''


The study led by Professor Kevin Anderson from The University of Manchester, is published in the journal Climate Policy. The team of climate scientists asked how close these countries are to meeting the UN’s climate commitments if the ‘safe’ quantity of emissions, the global carbon budget, is shared fairly between ‘developing’ and ‘developed’ countries.
''The researchers concluded that despite the UK and Sweden claiming to have world leading climate legislation, their planned reductions in emissions will still lead to total emissions two to three times greater than is their fair share of a Paris-compliant global carbon budget.''


Professor Kevin Anderson, draws a damning conclusion from the research:
''The annual rate that emissions are expected to be cut is less than half of that required, with the scientists suggesting a minimum for the UK of 10% each year, starting in 2020. Similarly, the date of achieving a fully zero-carbon energy system should be around 2035, rather than the UK’s current ‘net-zero’ by 2050 legislation.''


"Academics have done an excellent job in understanding and communicating climate science, but the same cannot be said in relation to reducing emissions. Here we have collectively denied the necessary scale of mitigation, running scared of calling for fundamental changes to both our energy system and the lifestyles of high-energy users."
''The study led by Professor Kevin Anderson from The University of Manchester, is published in the journal Climate Policy. The team of climate scientists asked how close these countries are to meeting the UN’s climate commitments if the ‘safe’ quantity of emissions, the global carbon budget, is shared fairly between ‘developing’ and ‘developed’ countries.''
 
''Professor Kevin Anderson, draws a damning conclusion from the research: ''
 
''"Academics have done an excellent job in understanding and communicating climate science, but the same cannot be said in relation to reducing emissions. Here we have collectively denied the necessary scale of mitigation, running scared of calling for fundamental changes to both our energy system and the lifestyles of high-energy users."''




Line 25: Line 28:




[[Category:About Us]]
[[Category:Air Quality]]
[[Category:Air Pollution]]
[[Category:Agriculture]]
[[Category:Alternative Agriculture]]
[[Category:Antarctica]]
[[Category:Anthropocene]]
[[Category:Anthropocene]]
[[Category:Arctic]]
[[Category:Atmospheric Science]]
[[Category:Atmospheric Science]]
[[Category:City Governments]]
[[Category:City Governments]]
Line 38: Line 34:
[[Category:Climate Migration]]
[[Category:Climate Migration]]
[[Category:Climate Policy]]
[[Category:Climate Policy]]
[[Category:County Governments]]
[[Category:Desertification]]
[[Category:Desertification]]
[[Category:Digital Citizen]]
[[Category:Earth Imaging]]
[[Category:Earth Imaging]]
[[Category:Earth Observations]]
[[Category:Earth Observations]]
Line 59: Line 53:
[[Category:Externalities]]
[[Category:Externalities]]
[[Category:Extinction]]
[[Category:Extinction]]
[[Category:Florida]]
[[Category:Food]]
[[Category:Forests]]
[[Category:Forests]]
[[Category:Fossil Fuels]]
[[Category:Fossil Fuels]]
[[Category:Greenland]]
[[Category:Global Security]]
[[Category:Global Security]]
[[Category:Global Warming]]
[[Category:Global Warming]]
Line 92: Line 83:
[[Category:Sea-level Rise]]
[[Category:Sea-level Rise]]
[[Category:Sea-Level Rise & Mitigation]]
[[Category:Sea-Level Rise & Mitigation]]
[[Category:Soil]]
[[Category:Solar Energy]]
[[Category:Solar Energy]]
[[Category:Strategic Demands]]
[[Category:Strategic Demands]]
[[Category:Sustainability Policies]]
[[Category:Sustainability Policies]]
[[Category:Sweden]]
[[Category:Threat Multiplier]]
[[Category:Threat Multiplier]]
[[Category:United Nations]]
[[Category:United Nations]]
[[Category:UK]]
[[Category:US]]
[[Category:US]]
[[Category:US Environmental Protection Agency]]
[[Category:US Environmental Protection Agency]]

Latest revision as of 17:01, 22 June 2020



Alex Steffen / University of Manchester Report


Even ‘climate progressive’ nations fall far short of Paris Agreement targets

New research focusing on the UK and Sweden, demonstrates just how far even ‘climate progressive’ nations are from meeting our international commitments to avoid dangerous climate change.

The researchers concluded that despite the UK and Sweden claiming to have world leading climate legislation, their planned reductions in emissions will still lead to total emissions two to three times greater than is their fair share of a Paris-compliant global carbon budget.

The annual rate that emissions are expected to be cut is less than half of that required, with the scientists suggesting a minimum for the UK of 10% each year, starting in 2020. Similarly, the date of achieving a fully zero-carbon energy system should be around 2035, rather than the UK’s current ‘net-zero’ by 2050 legislation.

The study led by Professor Kevin Anderson from The University of Manchester, is published in the journal Climate Policy. The team of climate scientists asked how close these countries are to meeting the UN’s climate commitments if the ‘safe’ quantity of emissions, the global carbon budget, is shared fairly between ‘developing’ and ‘developed’ countries.

Professor Kevin Anderson, draws a damning conclusion from the research:

"Academics have done an excellent job in understanding and communicating climate science, but the same cannot be said in relation to reducing emissions. Here we have collectively denied the necessary scale of mitigation, running scared of calling for fundamental changes to both our energy system and the lifestyles of high-energy users."


File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current16:54, 22 June 2020Thumbnail for version as of 16:54, 22 June 2020592 × 440 (71 KB)Siterunner (talk | contribs)

The following page uses this file: