File:Hourglass-sand-2.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<addthis />
● https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons




Line 8: Line 11:




Take a look at the latest at http://strategicdemands.com/ ...
GreenPolicy siterunner: Take a look at the latest at http://strategicdemands.com/ ...


Beginning in July 2017, we began a campaign at #StratDem to push for Congress to *immediately* act to review and reconsider the "singular authority" of the current president to launch nuclear first strikes.
Beginning in July 2017, GreenPolicy360 and Strategic Demands began a #StratDem campaign to push for Congress to *immediately* act to review and reconsider the "singular authority" of the current president to launch nuclear first strikes.


Nuclear weapon first use/preemptive use/preventive use (or whatever strategic term experts want to call this power that is in the hands of this president, and his shifts of emotion and strings of threats) continues to create evident cataclysmic danger.
Nuclear weapon first use/preemptive use/preventive use (or whatever strategic term experts want to call this power that is in the hands of this president, and his shifts of emotion and strings of threats) continues to create evident cataclysmic danger.

Revision as of 16:53, 15 November 2017

<addthis />

https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons


Thirty-seconds-closer-to-midnight.png



GreenPolicy siterunner: Take a look at the latest at http://strategicdemands.com/ ...

Beginning in July 2017, GreenPolicy360 and Strategic Demands began a #StratDem campaign to push for Congress to *immediately* act to review and reconsider the "singular authority" of the current president to launch nuclear first strikes.

Nuclear weapon first use/preemptive use/preventive use (or whatever strategic term experts want to call this power that is in the hands of this president, and his shifts of emotion and strings of threats) continues to create evident cataclysmic danger.

Read some of the pieces we've written over the past three months.

Tomorrow, the Senate Foreign Relations Com't is holding a hearing on this critical nuclear issue. We would like to think our work has had a role in this surprising, sudden decision to question nuclear weapon first use policy.


http://strategicdemands.com/prevent-nuclear-first-use/

http://strategicdemands.com/corkers-next-step/

http://strategicdemands.com/a-nuclear-meme/

http://strategicdemands.com/oversight-us-nuclear-arsenal/

http://strategicdemands.com/no-one-should-have-singular-nuclear-launch-authority/

https://twitter.com/mchanneling/status/928803222579499008

https://twitter.com/mchanneling/status/928801075775377408

https://twitter.com/StephenUCS/status/930108497680916480

https://twitter.com/plough_shares/status/929816842067210240

https://twitter.com/TMCountryman/status/930193032099573760

https://twitter.com/KingstonAReif/status/930179412280082432

http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/us-nuclear-weapons-policy/sole-authority


File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current12:34, 30 April 2017Thumbnail for version as of 12:34, 30 April 2017450 × 342 (12 KB)Siterunner (talk | contribs)