New Definitions of National Security: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(353 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Over the Pacific August 2015.png]]
<small>GreenPolicy360 / New Horizons of Security</small> 
<big><big>'''New Definitions of Security -- Local, National, & Global Security'''</big></big>
[[File:New Definitions of National Security.png]]
<big>'''GreenPolicy360 & Strategic Demands / #StratDem'''</big>
GreenPolicy360/StrategicDemands: The key to 21st century security is "strategic realism". Any full scientific assessment of security threats on the horizon is replete with environmental/global risks that are drawing daily into view. These risks are presenting a clear and present danger, in U.S. Department of Defense terms. A 'clear and present danger' has yet to be acknowledged by the US Department of Defense, or in the US military budget that approaches $1 trillion in annual spending. Other nations continue and are now escalating a weapons race that sees security in terms of defense/military spending. This cannot be sustained. 
* https://strategicdemands.com/costsofwar/
[[File:Strategic Demands of the 21st Century A New Vision for a New World.jpg]]
<small>* https://greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Strategic_Demands_of_the_21st_Century_A_New_Vision_for_a_New_World.jpg</small>
················································································
<big><big>'''[[In Defense of Democracy and Freedom]]'''</big></big>
• https://greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Democracy
• https://greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Human_Rights
• https://greenpolicy360.net/w/The_Commons
New definitions of security are demanded... forward planning with a new and more acutely aware vision of security.
* https://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/
GreenPolicy360 and its associate [http://www.strategicdemands.com Strategic Demands] challenge prevailing views that are not focused as they must be on existential threats of our era. A new vision of security must drive the politics of our times. New definitions of national and global security must become highest priorities.
The climate crisis is real. Severe eco-impacts are now being experienced by communities, local to national, as science is reporting with voluminous data warnings of a proliferating threat horizon.
Action is demanded in response. We must move climate and environmental impacts from 'irritants' to a central role as we rethink security risks. GreenPolicy360 and Strategic Demands point the way toward the new definitions, responses and solutions necessary for comprehensive, and sustainable security.
[[File:A Planet Citizen View.png]]
NASA
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/User:Siterunner <big>'''GreenPolicy360 Founder / Siterunner'''</big>]
New definitions of national and global security, new strategic priorities are necessary for a more rational defense of our larger security interests... It is critical to move beyond the failed national security policies of the past.''
[[File:StratDem logo.png]]
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Strategic_Demands
* https://strategicdemands.com/
🌎
<big><big>'''2024'''</big></big>
[[File:Facts about US Energy Use.jpg]]
'''''How do Americans power their lives? Steve Ballmer breaks down the facts about US energy use, production, and environmental impact. Get the data right from US government sources.'''''
<big>'''Watch the Video and Read the 'Facts about US Energy' Transcript'''</big>
* https://usafacts.org/just-the-facts/energy/
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCbUx_znoYg
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Ballmer
'''About USAFacts'''
Steve Ballmer launched USAFacts.org in 2017, a not-for-profit organization whose goal is to allow people to understand U.S. government revenue, spending and societal impact. He is reported to have contributed $10 million to fund teams of researchers who populated the website's database with official data.
🌎
<big>'''AI App, 'How Fast Is Renewable Energy Growing Statistically?''''</big>
"Grounding AI in reality with a little help from Data Commons"
:[[File:Ground AI in Reality, a Renewable Energy case study.jpeg]]
::<small>* https://research.google/blog/grounding-ai-in-reality-with-a-little-help-from-data-commons/</small>
🌎
[[File:IEA energy chart - 2023.jpg]]
<big><big>'''2023'''</big></big>
As the world transitions to renewable energy and wrests itself off decades of wars to control and secure fossil fuel sources, most visibly in the Mideast with its unsurpassed oil reserves and production, intermittent hopes for new horizons, and peace, have been crushed by generation-to-generation war.
October 2023 sees war again and, as the world watches in pain and shock with media reports streaming into every nation, we at GreenPolicy360 and our associate Strategic Demands recall the history and causes.
* https://strategicdemands.com/terror-attack-on-israel/
War and oil have been inextricably linked since the early 1900s and European military might transitioned from coal to oil. The newly discovered great oil fields in the Mideast led to a rush to control these essential strategic assets. The demand for oil to power industrialization is a story of the 20th century and for decades wars raged to own and control energy supplies emanating from this resource rich region.
Yet few realize the arc of these struggles and their costs passed forward. Now as another war is declared, one must acknowledge the costs and dangers of what is called "blowback", most notably by Chalmers Johnson in his books that have turned focus to the causes, costs and consequences of 100+ years of geopolitics, religion and revenge. Memories go back centuries and in modern times one can point to the British navy's transition of its warship fleet from coal to diesel oil, originating circa 1910 with Winston Churchill's decisions and Britain's military actions to control Iranian oil fields. This can be seen, generationally, as one in a generational nexus that have led to current Mideast conflicts.  Iranian (Persian) oil powering the global British colonial power, a chessboard of Western nation moves to control oil/gas/fossil fuel-carbon resources in the region... and wars-begetting-wars, with an eye-for-an-eye biblical background and blowback operating and consequential dynamics.
The consequences of war are lasting and blowback should be taught in 'war colleges'.
[https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/gore-vidal/perpetual-war-for-perpetual-peace/ ''' "Perpetual war for perpetual peace" -- Not''']
* https://www.amazon.com/Blowback-Consequences-American-Empire-Project/dp/0805075593
* https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40718.The_Sorrows_of_Empire
* https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/64711.Nemesis
·······················································································
<big>'''Looking Back, Looking Forward, a first strategic briefing from Strategic Demands'''</big>
<big>'''Strategic Demands of the 21st Century: A New Vision for a New World'''</big>
Spring 2005
'''Roger Morris and Steve Schmidt evoke history, envision political alternatives and offer a provocative reappraisal of national security policy in a swiftly changing world'''
''America remains so unresponsive to the new challenges — the politics of foreign policy so corrupted and stifled, the public so misled — that a great national debate on national security is itself an urgent strategic imperative.''
''The moment requires bold innovative approaches to our interests and responsibilities on a drastically changed, swiftly changing planet. What we see as essential to a wide-ranging democratic discussion and debate is a new strategic discourse, addressing causes as well as effects. We must look ahead, envision and plan without illusion or compromising influence, recognize new realities, tell unpopular truths, put the national interest ahead of office, educate and act.''
''This paper, the first in a series outlining an alternative and comprehensive ‘national security’ vision, offers practical, constructive policies along with essential changes in the democratic politics and governance of national security that must accompany such an authentic and sustained policy change.''
* https://strategicdemands.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Strategic-Demands_A-NewVision-for-a-New-World.pdf
·········································································································
The overarching vision of  '''"New Definitions of National Security"''' proposed by GreenPolicy360 and Strategic Demands looks away from orthodoxies professing perpetual war in a nuclear age as inevitable and rational. Constant war, hard power, 'might makes right', these beliefs are conventional and axiomatic in today's world, yet on a closer examination these concepts are 'Orwellian'. George Orwell's dictate "war is peace" is fallacy, and constant war (does not) bring constant peace. As Gore Vidal wrote of [https://oceanofpdf.com/authors/gore-vidal/pdf-epub-perpetual-war-for-perpetual-peace-download-77887643032/?id=000636463239 '''perpetual war'''] after the September 11, 2001 terror attack on the World Trade Center, perpetual war does not bring perpetual peace.
The litany of failed orthodox beliefs is visibly producing generational conflict and arms races. Today's nuclear weapons race, which StratDem refers to as [https://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/ '''2.0'''] and [https://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-arms-race-3-0/ '''3.0'''] 'more usable and lethal' versions, the threat is extending to all nations and life on Earth.
Long overdue, it's dawning that new visions of security are essential. Realistically, this vision requires multi-national action to deliver new clean, renewable energy moving every nation away from fossil-fueled conflicts, wars and global climate disruption.
Positive change is possible, old ways and failed orthodoxies can be pushed aside.
Doors can be opened for a human rights agenda, environmental protection and quality of life.
<big>'''[[Generation Green]]</big>
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Generation_Green
<big>'''[[Quality of Life]]'''</big>
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Quality_of_Life
[[File:Commons-concepts permanent culture now.png]]
Environmental security and quality of life are essential to peace and well-being.
* https://greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security
* https://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/
* https://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
* https://strategicdemands.com/costsofwar/
<big>'''Climate Action Plans 360'''</big>
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Climate_Plans_Enforcement_-_Resources | GrnPolicy360: Climate Plans Enforcement Initiative
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Methods_to_enforce_climate_pledges-NDCs_-_Dec_2021.png | Methods to Enforce Climate Plan Pledges
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:INDC | Pressuring Nations to Step Up, Cooperate, and Act Now
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Global_Stocktake,_the_first_GST.jpg | Com't on Earth Observation Satellites
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Laws | Environmental Laws, Regs, Rules... Lawsuits & Legal Actions
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Glasgow_Climate_Summit_-_Pledges,_Promises,_Declarations_-_What%27s_Next_Up | Glasgow (2021) & Paris (2015) Summits: Int'l Climate Plan Pledges & Promises (INDCs-NDCs)
············
<big><big>'''2022'''</big></big>
'''June 2022'''
GreenPolicy360: A tip of our hat to Bill McKibben, our former adviser and long-time friend, who points to a decision by the U.S. president to invoke the Defense Production Act as a signal that [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:National_Security '''new definitions of national security are demanded'''] as the nation attempts to move with speed and scale to renewable energy.
Let's look at the decision via two articles -- one, news and two, opinion.
<big><big>''Activists hail Biden’s use of security powers to boost clean energy''</big></big>
''President invokes Defense Production Act to increase production of solar panels, building insulation and other equipment''
* https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/07/biden-climate-change-defense-production-act
               
''Environmental groups have welcomed Joe Biden’s invoking of national security powers to rapidly expand the production of clean energy technology as a significant advance in the effort to curb dangerous climate breakdown.''
''Biden has triggered the Defense Production Act, a cold war-era law used to compel businesses to ramp up production of certain materials to aid national security, to boost the output of solar panels, building insulation, transformers for power grids and heat pumps, which are used to efficiently heat and cool homes.''
''The US president has also provided a two-year exemption to solar panel companies from tariffs on imported parts, easing the flow of technology from China and other countries for use in the US, a country where only 2.8% of electricity comes from solar power.''
''The moves have been applauded by climate activists who have pressed for Biden to use the breadth of his presidential powers to act on the climate crisis. Activists have sharply criticized the president in recent months over the continuing failure to pass major climate legislation through an evenly divided Senate...''
''The use of the Defense Production Act will allow the US Department of Energy to invest in companies that can build renewable energy facilities and manufacture parts for technology such as solar panels. The administration expects domestic solar manufacturing will now triple by 2024, allowing more than 3.3m homes each year to switch to solar energy.''
''A shift to cleaner sources of electricity would also help protect against energy bill volatility and provide efficiency to households, say proponents – heat pumps, for example, can save homes $1,000 each year from space heating alone. The administration has also sought to stress the benefits of weaning the US off the supply of fossil fuels from countries such as Russia. “Reducing America’s dependence on gas and oil is critical to US national security,” said Kathleen Hicks, deputy secretary of defense.''
<big><big>''Enormous Thanks to All Who Helped Win a Big Heat Pump Victory Today''</big></big>
By Bill McKibben
June 6, 2022
* https://billmckibben.substack.com/p/enormous-thanks-to-all-who-helped
''Earlier today, President Biden signed the above order, which mandates the use of the 1950 Defense Production Act to sput the production of heat pumps, because, as he puts it in the text, “ensuring a robust, resilient, and sustainable domestic industrial base to meet the requirements of the clean energy economy is essential to our national security, a resilient energy sector, and the preservation of domestic critical infrastructure.”''
''Readers of this newsletter played a big role in making this happen. I broached the idea here on February 27, 3 days after the Ukraine invasion, in an article called Heat Pumps for Peace and Freedom. Within a couple of days, a group called Rewiring America had fleshed out the plan, and Third Act had begun to push it out across the country, getting older Americans to write letters by the score. Between you all, the effort paid off. Biden’s order isn’t precisely what we’d called for, since the heat pumps are destined for U.S. homes instead of European ones—but that may well be more politically palatable, and in any event, as we’ve pointed out over and over, oil is a global market. If we can suppress demand here by giving people efficient technology, it will help drive down the windfall that rising oil prices have provided Putin.''
''In any event, three cheers''
''One is for the Biden administration, which has done something admirable. I was talking to a Wall Street Journal reporter over the weekend, lamenting that Manchin had managed to bottle up the Biden climate program—this is a sign that the president’s team is finally uncorking that bottle. And they did it quickly—late February to early June is unprecedented speed in DC time.''
''A second is for Substack. As with most platforms, this one can be used for unpleasant infighting. But it also allows people to surface plans and ideas before they’re fully formed and vetted. If I had proposed that piece to some editor, they might well have said: ‘does anyone else care about this?” Which is the kind of smart and useful question that makes one happy to have editors. But sometimes it’s useful to be able to just get something out fast so that others can begin to react: if traditional journalism is the first draft of history, Substack in this fashion serves as the sketchbook for that first draft.''
''And the third cheer is for all of you. Ideas do absolutely no good unless lots of people get behind them and make noise. That’s what movements are—people making impossible things possible. I’m immensely grateful to everyone who wrote and pestered their politicians about this; it worked.''
''This single measure obviously doesn’t solve our problems, in Russia or in the atmosphere. But it’s a hopeful sign that we can still get something done. Stay tuned.''
[https://billmckibben.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=web&utm_source=subscribe-widget-preamble&utm_content=58296548 Subscribe to Bill McKibben on Substack]
🌎
[[File:Climate Change Poses a Widening Threat to National Security.png]]
::::<small>* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Climate_Migration</small>
&nbsp;
······································································································································
:<small>'''''From GreenPolicy360's associate, Strategic Demands'''''</small>
: <small>* ''https://strategicdemands.com/eyes-on-the-global-security-threat''</small>
[[File:Eyes On Global Security Threats - via Strategic Demands April 2022.png|link=https://strategicdemands.com/eyes-on-the-global-security-threat/]]
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ  —  Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
<big><big>'''Biden's (and the World's) Imperiled Climate Agenda'''</big></big>
* https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/01/climate/biden-climate-change.html
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ  —  Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
'''May 2022'''
[[File:Nuclear Threats and Responses.png]]
: '''The Russia - Ukraine War Continues Raising New Nuclear Risks'''
::'''Visit GreenPolicy360's Associate 'Strategic Demands' for More...'''
:* https://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-threats-and-responses/
:* https://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-threats-again-from-the-north/
:* https://strategicdemands.com/quotes-rattling-ratcheting-nukes/
:* https://strategicdemands.com/eyes-on-the-global-security-threat/
:* https://strategicdemands.com/will-russia-lose-the-war/
:* https://strategicdemands.com/sanctions-bite-russias-putin-responds/
'''April 2022'''
<big><big>'''War in Ukraine Multiplies International Threats'''</big></big>
'''Threatened Use of Nuclear Weapons in the News'''
[[File:Russia threats re nuclear weapons - Apr 17 2022.png]]
[[File:Russia threats re nuclear weapons (2) - Apr 17 2022.png]]
<big>'''Ratcheting Up, New Nuclear Arms Race, Rapid Increasing in Weapons Budgets'''</big>
'''U.S. Military Budget Analysts William Hartung and Julia Gledhill Examine the Numbers'''
April 17, 2022
''Back in September 2008, Senator Joe Biden offered a bit of wisdom while running for vice president on Barack Obama's ticket. In a speech criticizing the Republican presidential campaign of senatorial colleague John McCain, he claimed to be quoting his own father when he said: "Show me your budget and I’ll tell you what you value."''
''... the next Pentagon budget, at an astronomical $813 billion dollars, is heading for passage by a humongous congressional majority. (To put that figure in perspective, it's $75 billion more than Donald Trump's last "defense" budget.) Worse yet, numerous representatives, particularly on the Republican side of the aisle, are already demanding yet more of the same. In fact, in think-tank Washington and beyond, there are now even calls for a future Pentagon budget that would top one trillion dollars annually. Imagine that, in a country already spending more on what's still called "national security" than the next 11 countries combined...''
* https://tomdispatch.com/the-new-gold-rush/
○
[[File:Profits of War - $14 Trillion - Read the Brown Univ-Watson Instit Report.PNG]]
[[File:Costs of War US Post 9-11 War Spending.jpg]]
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ  —  Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
Moving from the Quotidian to the Big Picture...
<big><big>Environmental Security  ↔  National Security</big></big>
'''National Security: Enhanced via Environmental Security'''
[https://www.strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/ '''@ Strategic Demands: "New Definitions of National Security"''']
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:New_Definitions_of_National_Security '''@ GreenPolicy360: "New Definitions of National Security"''']


[[File:Environment and Security.jpg]]
[[File:Environment and Security.jpg]]


; <big><big>New Definitions of National & Global Security</big></big>


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ  -----   Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
: <big><big>[[Earth and Space, Politics]]</big></big> 🌎
 
::<big><big>[[Climate News]]</big></big> 🌎
 
 
 
<big><big>'''2021'''</big></big>
 
 
 
<big><big>'''Upheaval in Central Asia Impacts the Future of Clean Energy Production?'''</big></big>
 
''''Rare Earth' Minerals & Mining Are Strategically Vital in EV Manufacturing''' 
 
 
<big><big>'''[[Rare Earths and EV Production]]'''</big></big>
 
 
 
·································································
 
 
 
:[[File:Climate Change US EPA.jpg]]
 
 
:[[File:Climate and National Security.jpg]]
 
 
:: GreenPolicy360/Strategic Demands:
 
 
::[[File:Earth System Observatory-2.jpg]]
 
 
&nbsp;
 
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_System_Science <big><big><big>'''Earth System Science'''</big></big></big>]
 
<big><big>'''Earth System Observatory @StrategicDemands'''</big></big>
 
* https://strategicdemands.com/earth-system-observatory/
 
 
More on Earth Science Missions
 
: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Research_from_Space '''Earth Science Research from Space''']
 
: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/New_Definitions_of_National_Security '''New Definitions of National Security''']
 
: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/@Earth360 '''@Earth360''']
 
: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/OCO-2 '''OCO-2 / OCO-3''']
 
: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Right_Now '''Earth Right Now''']
 
: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Vital_Signs '''Earth Science Vital Signs''']
 
 
·············································
 
 
<big>'''NASA - Global Climate Change'''</big>
 
''Images of Change''
 
* https://climate.nasa.gov/images-of-change
 
 
 
<big>'''31 Vital Earth Signs'''</big>
 
'' 'Virtual signs' worsening''
 
''Tipping points, deepening disaster''
 
* https://phys.org/news/2021-07-earth-vital-worsening-humanity-impact.html
 
 
''Researchers, part of a group of more than 14,000 scientists who have signed on to an initiative declaring a worldwide climate emergency, said that governments had consistently failed to address the root cause of climate change: "the overexploitation of the Earth".''
 
''Of 31 "vital signs"—key metrics of planetary health that include greenhouse gas emissions, glacier thickness, sea-ice extent and deforestation—they found that 18 hit record highs or lows.''
 
 
 
···························································
 
 
 
<big><big>[https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ATA-2021-Unclassified-Report.pdf Annual Threat Assessment]</big></big>
 
 
<big>"Cascading Challenges": Rumblings of a Shift in How the U.S. Assesses Security Threats'''</big>
 
 
'''Senate Intelligence Committee’s Worldwide Threats Hearing'''
 
Via the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS)
 
April 2021
 
* https://www.csis.org/analysis/intelligence-communitys-annual-threat-assessment-and-senate-intelligence-committees
 
 
''This annual report of worldwide threats to the national security of the United States responds to Section 617 of the FY21 Intelligence Authorization Act (P.L. 116-260).  This report reflects the collective insights of the Intelligence Community(IC), which is committed every day to providing the nuanced, independent, and unvarnished intelligence that policymakers, war fighters, and domestic law enforcement personnel need to protect American lives and America’s interests anywhere in the world.This assessment focuses on the most direct, serious threats to the United States during the next year.  The order of the topics presented in this assessment does not necessarily indicate their relative importance or the magnitude of the threats in the view of the IC.  All require a robust intelligence response, including those where a near-term focus may help head off greater threats in the future, such as climate change and environmental degradation.''
 
 
'''''What did Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines mean when she said the United States should “broaden our definition of national security?”'''''
 
 
''The Annual Threat Assessment (ATA) and following hearings devoted time to discuss the Covid-19 pandemic and climate change. While the IC has long had in-house experts exploring the national security implications of '''health issues and environmental pressures, both are generally considered as irritants giving rise to core national security considerations like political instability or resource-based conflict rather than national security issues in and of themselves'''. (boldface added) Director Haines seems to be advocating for a more central role for issues like these in the IC’s work.''
 
''And this is the rub: the world is big and complex, there is more data to read than any human can read, and many of the issues are intertwined. This is what the IC means by “cascading” challenges — a global pandemic is not merely a public health issue—it also causes economic disruption that can lead to migration and political destabilization, and the indicators providing warning of these threats are not stealable secrets. Sorting the signal from the noise in a world with a lot of noise is the central challenge for the IC, and it will need transformative reform, including massive computing resources and artificial intelligence and machine learning assistance, to make sense of it.''
 
 
··························
 
 
Avril Haines was sworn in as the Director of National Intelligence on January 21, 2021. She is the seventh Senate-confirmed DNI in our nation’s history and the first woman to lead the U.S. Intelligence Community.
 
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
 
* https://www.dni.gov/index.php/who-we-are/organizations
 
By statute, the DNI is the principal  intelligence  adviser  to  the  President,  and  determines  and manages  the  National  Intelligence  Program  (NIP)  budget  of  more than $50 billion, the U.S. government’s total intelligence spending aside  from  military  intelligence.  The  DNI  is  also  tasked  with integrating  the  efforts  of  the  17  elements  of  the  Intelligence Community (IC).
 
 
○
 
 
'''April 19, 2021'''
 
 
<big>'''International Climate Meeting Online'''</big>
 
At the invitation of the new US president, nations gathered this week in a virtual climate summit to share their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) toward solving the climate change crisis.
 
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Earth_Day_2021_-_Climate_Summit_News-1.jpg
 
We, GreenPolicy360 with our associate [https://www.strategicdemands.com Strategic Demands], will cover news of the climate conference, both good and bad. Our several decades of pushing for immediate, concerted action and [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/New_Definitions_of_National_Security 'New Definitions of National Security'] by all nations is front of stage, and confronted by old definitions of security, conflicts and wars, that take our eyes off of the existential challenges of climate -- and a resurgent, escalating nuclear weapons threat.
 
Here, in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, we look at a key group of experts sounding the alarm about both climate disaster and nuclear war.
 
They are the great challenges of our time and must given a spotlight and focus of our citizen action.
 
 
 
* https://thebulletin.org/premium/2021-01/climate-change-should-be-recognized-for-what-it-is-an-issue-of-national-security/
 
''By most accounts, President-Elect Biden looks to position climate change as a central organizing principle in his Executive Branch. Through cabinet appointments of sympathetic experts at agencies not normally at the fore of environmental policy—such as Treasury, Justice, and Transportation—Biden hopes to deliver wide-ranging wins on climate policy. The EPA, the Energy Department, and the Interior Department will be redeployed in Obama-era roles as key instruments for aggressive climate action. These would all be positive steps forward.''
 
 
 
·····················································································································
 
 
 
<big><big>'''Survey Finds Overwhelming International Support for Greater Environmental Protection'''</big></big>
 
''“We live in a time of polarisation, and environmental issues have long embodied the political divisions in society. However, this may be changing. We can see an overwhelming consensus emerging for greater government-led action to protect the environment in major nations.”''
 
* https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/COP26survey
 
* https://www.ecowatch.com/cop26-environmental-protection-2650859118.html
 
 
&nbsp;
 
:[[File:Renewable Energy potential 2021.jpg]]
 
 
 
·······················································································································
 
 
<big><big>'''Acknowledging a Profound Shift in U.S. Security Policy'''</big></big>
 
Biden administration accelerates out of the starting gate
 
'''GreenPolicy360:'''
 
Yes, a redefinition of U.S. national (and global) security is now being envisioned. GreenPolicy360's point of view on the strategic demand for a new 21st century vision is taking place. The new U.S. Biden administration with governing leadership, executive orders, and promised follow-on legislative actions, is making a strong push to redefine real security. New definitions, new vision, operational multi-front action is 'in the works'...
 
* https://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/
 
 
Here, Michael E. Mann begins to capture the moment in a USA Today opinion:
 
* https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/4336625001
 
''Now, Biden is gathering his council to assess the current and future dangers in this fight, including all 17 intelligence agencies; a general on the international front, John Kerry, who will also have a seat on the National Security Council and will direct our diplomatic efforts abroad; and another general on the domestic front, former Environmental Protection Agency administrator Gina McCarthy, who will coordinate climate action in the homeland.'' 
 
 
'''''PART I — PUTTING THE CLIMATE CRISIS AT THE CENTER OF UNITED STATES FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY'''''
 
* https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/27/executive-order-on-tackling-the-climate-crisis-at-home-and-abroad/
 
 
''Section 101.  Policy.  United States international engagement to address climate change — which has become a climate crisis — is more necessary and urgent than ever.  The scientific community has made clear that the scale and speed of necessary action is greater than previously believed.  There is little time left to avoid setting the world on a dangerous, potentially catastrophic, climate trajectory.  Responding to the climate crisis will require both significant short-term global reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and net-zero global emissions by mid-century or before.''
 
''It is the policy of my Administration that climate considerations shall be an essential element of United States foreign policy and national security.  The United States will work with other countries and partners, both bilaterally and multilaterally, to put the world on a sustainable climate pathway.  The United States will also move quickly to build resilience, both at home and abroad, against the impacts of climate change that are already manifest and will continue to intensify according to current trajectories.''
 
''Sec. 102.  Purpose.  This order builds on and reaffirms actions my Administration has already taken to place the climate crisis at the forefront of this Nation’s foreign policy and national security planning...''
 
[https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/27/executive-order-on-tackling-the-climate-crisis-at-home-and-abroad/ '''''More''''']
 
 
○
 
 
<big>'''Biden Team 'Hits the Ground Running' '''</big>
 
'''''Climate change ..... "an existential threat"...'''''
 
* https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/27/remarks-by-president-biden-before-signing-executive-actions-on-tackling-climate-change-creating-jobs-and-restoring-scientific-integrity/
 
 
''President Biden steps up:''
 
''The executive order I’ll be signing establishes a White House Office of Domestic Climate Policy.  And it’ll be led by one of America’s most distinguished climate leaders, former EPA Director Gina McCarthy.  As the head of the new office and my National Climate Advisor, Gina will chair a National Climate Task Force, made up of many members of our Cabinet, to deliver a whole-of-government approach to the climate crisis.''
 
''(T)he whole-of-government approach is necessary... We’re going to work with mayors and governors and tribal leaders and business leaders who are stepping up, and the young people organizing and leading the way.  My message to those young people is: You have the full capacity and power of the federal government.  Your government is going to work with you.''
 
''... a new, modern-day Civilian Climate Corps ...''
 
''Look, this executive order I’m signing today also makes it official that climate change will be at the center of our national security and foreign policy...''
 
''Actionable solutions, not pie-in-the-sky dreams... it is not time for small measures; we need to be bold...''
 
''(T)oday’s executive order will help strengthen that commitment by working with other nations to support the most vulnerable to the impact of climate change and to increase our collective resilience.  That includes a summit of world leaders that I’ll convene to address this climate crisis on Earth Day, this year.
 
''In order to establish a new effort to integrate the security implications of climate change as part of our national security and risk assessment and analysis will also be included.''
 
''Earlier this month, I nominated Dr. Eric Lander, a brilliant scientist who is here today, to be the Director of the Office of Science and Technology.  I also nominated another brilliant scientist, Dr. Frances Arnold and Dr. Maria Zuber, to co-chair the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology...''
 
[https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/27/remarks-by-president-biden-before-signing-executive-actions-on-tackling-climate-change-creating-jobs-and-restoring-scientific-integrity/ '''''More''''']
 
 
 
············
 
 
<big><big>'''2020'''</big></big>
 
 
[[File:Biden selects Kerry as special climate envoy.jpg]]
 
 
<big>November 23, 2020</big>
 
 
<big><big>'''U.S. President Elect Selects John Kerry as International Climate 'Envoy' '''</big></big>
 
:'''First-ever Climate Security Position Created by Biden '''
 
:'''Kerry to Join National Security Council with Presidential Cabinet-level Status'''
 
 
'''GreenPolicy360 & Strategic Demands applaud this historic, critically important shift in the U.S. policy and vision'''
 
For years GreenPolicy360 and StratDem have advocated Climate Policy become a U.S. National/Global Security priority
 
:* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Climate_Policy
:* https://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
 
 
<big>'''New Definitions of National & Global Security'''</big>
 
:* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/New_Definitions_of_National_Security
:* https://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/
 
 
·················································································
 
 
<big>'''President-elect Biden planning to leave the Trump years of climate change denial behind'''</big>
 
The incoming U.S. president pledges to act fast, to rejoin the international Paris climate agreement on his first day in office and immediately flex a muscular, aggressive program of climate actions
 
* https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/climate/biden-climate-change.html
 
 
:[[File:Joe Biden - European news.png]]
 
 
 
:··············································································
 
 
'''Nationalism and Division: U.S. Reputation and Status Continues to Decline in the Eyes of the World'''
 
 
[[File:Poor ratings for US 2020.jpg]]
 
 
 
····························································································
 
 
<big><big><big>'''This App Could Be a Game Changer'''</big></big></big>
 
'''This could be a very big deal'''
 
''There’s an old truism in the business world: what gets measured gets managed. One of the challenges in managing the greenhouse gas emissions warming the atmosphere is that they aren’t measured very well.''
 
''“Currently, most countries do not know where most of their emissions come from,” says Kelly Sims Gallagher, a professor of energy and environmental policy at Tufts University’s Fletcher School. “Even in advanced economies like the United States, emissions are estimated for many sectors.” Without this information “you cannot devise smart and effective policies to mitigate emissions,” she says, and “you cannot track them to see if you are making progress against your goals.”''
 
 
 
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:You_can_manage_only_what_you_can_measure_Dr_David_Crisp,_OCO-2,_June_2014_m.jpg<big><big>'''Measure to Manage'''</big></big>]
 
[[File:You can manage only what you can measure Dr David Crisp, OCO-2, June 2014 m.jpg]]
 
 
''The ultimate solution to this problem — the killer app, as it were — would be real-time tracking of all global greenhouse gases, verified by objective third parties, and available for free to the public.''
 
''Now, a new alliance of climate research groups called the Climate TRACE (Tracking Real-Time Atmospheric Carbon Emissions) Coalition has launched an effort to make the vision a reality, and they’re aiming to have it ready for COP26, the climate meetings in Glasgow, Scotland, in November 2021 (postponed from November 2020). If they pull it off, it could completely change the tenor and direction of international climate talks.''


; <big><big>Environmental Security ↔ National Security</big></big>
* https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2020/7/16/21324662/climate-change-air-pollution-tracking-greenhouse-gas-emissions-trace-coalition


'''National Security: Enhanced & Extended via Environmental Security Policy & Practices'''


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Environmental_Security_Organizations
························································


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Observations


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Climate_News


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
'''Big Green / Renewable Energy Storage Solutions'''
 
Being Engineered for Tomorrow's World
 
* https://electrek.co/2020/02/27/tesla-1gwh-megapack-battery-project-pge-approved/
 
 
:···································································································
 
 
[[File:Climate Models.png]]
 
 
 
<big><big>'''''2019'''''</big></big>
 
 
'''Moving Past a World of Wars to Control Petro-Resources'''
 
 
''Rebecca Solnit in [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/08/oil-fuels-war-terrorists-isis-climate-movement-peace-cop-21 The Guardian] / October 2019: To define the climate movement as a peace movement means defining the wars it seeks to end. They have been filthy, brutal and corrosive. We can do better. We can move past fossil fuel. We can take back power, both political and literal energy-generating power, from these inhuman entities that have dominated much of the earth for a century. We, civil society, we who get poisoned and killed and we who have built a great and powerful climate movement, can make peace, with our energy sources, with our planet and with each other.''
 
 
··············································
 
 
<big>'''''Existential Language'''''</big>
 
<big>'''''Capturing the Seriousness, the Challenge, and the Crisis'''''</big>
 
 
[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/may/17/why-the-guardian-is-changing-the-language-it-uses-about-the-environment '''''Via The Guardian / May 17, 2019''''']
 
''The Guardian has updated its style guide to introduce terms that more accurately describe the environmental crises facing the world.
 
''Instead of “climate change” the preferred terms are “climate emergency, crisis or breakdown” and “global heating” is favoured over “global warming”, although the original terms are not banned.''
 
''“We want to ensure that we are being scientifically precise, while also communicating clearly with readers on this very important issue,” said the editor-in-chief, Katharine Viner. “The phrase ‘climate change’, for example, sounds rather passive and gentle when what scientists are talking about is a catastrophe for humanity.”''
 
''“Increasingly, climate scientists and organisations from the UN to the Met Office are changing their terminology, and using stronger language to describe the situation we’re in.”''
 
''The United Nations secretary general, António Guterres, talked of the “climate crisis” in September, adding: “We face a direct existential threat.” The climate scientist Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, a former adviser to Angela Merkel, the EU and the pope, also uses “climate crisis”.''
Advertisement
 
''In December, Prof Richard Betts, who leads the Met Office’s climate research, said “global heating” was a more accurate term than “global warming” to describe the changes taking place to the world’s climate. In the political world, UK MPs recently endorsed the Labour party’s declaration of a “climate emergency”.''
 
''The scale of the climate and wildlife crises has been laid bare by two landmark reports from the world’s scientists. In October, they said carbon emissions must halve by 2030 to avoid even greater risks of drought, floods, extreme heat and poverty for hundreds of millions of people. In May, global scientists said human society was in jeopardy from the accelerating annihilation of wildlife and destruction of the ecosystems that support all life on Earth.''
 
''Other terms that have been updated, including the use of “wildlife” rather than “biodiversity”, “fish populations” instead of “fish stocks” and “climate science denier” rather than “climate sceptic”. In September, the BBC accepted it gets coverage of climate change “wrong too often” and told staff: “You do not need a ‘denier’ to balance the debate.”''
 
''Earlier in May, Greta Thunberg, the Swedish teenager who has inspired school strikes for climate around the globe, said: “It’s 2019. Can we all now call it what it is: climate breakdown, climate crisis, climate emergency, ecological breakdown, ecological crisis and ecological emergency?”''
 
&nbsp; 
 
 
:[[File:Michael E Mann -- act with hope not fear.jpg]]
 
 
 
························································
 
&nbsp;
 
<big><big><big>'''Strategic Demands'''</big></big></big>
 
<big>'''A New Vision by Roger Morris & Steven Schmidt'''</big>
 
'''[[Surviving Victory: Security Priorities]]'''
 
&nbsp; 
 
Revisiting the Foundation of StrategicDemands.com
 
* https://strategicdemands.com/about/
 
 
[[File:Strategic Demands of the 21st Century A New Vision for a New World.png]]
 
 
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/mw/images/Strategic_Demands_of_the_21st_Century,_a_New_Vision_re_Surviving_Victory_conf.pdf <small>Strategic Demands of the 21st Century (PDF) / Published 2005 </small>]
 
 
[https://www.strategicdemands.com/new-year-messages-ominous-2019/ <big>'''''Strategic Demands: Ominous 2019'''''</big>]
 
 
• https://www.strategicdemands.com/carnegie-nuclear-policy-conference/
 
• https://www.strategicdemands.com/regional-nuclear-conflict-global-nuclear-catastrophe/
 
• https://www.strategicdemands.com/global-security-fears-climate-and-u-s/
 
• https://www.strategicdemands.com/back-to-the-brink-nuclear-catastrophe/
 
• https://www.strategicdemands.com/dems-re-intro-bill-to-prevent-nuclear-first-use/
 
• https://www.strategicdemands.com/bulletin-of-atomic-scientists-two-minutes/
 
• https://www.strategicdemands.com/nukes-nuking-nuked/
 
• https://www.strategicdemands.com/kcna-re-denuclearization/
 
• https://www.strategicdemands.com/hello-down-there/
 
 
 
·················································································
 
 
<big>'''''Jerry Brown Joins with The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists'''''</big>
''California Governor Jerry Brown to focus on 'existential threats', climate and nuclear weapons, as his fourth term in office draws to a close and his next chapter of life begins:
 
''"I'm a planetary realist. We are linked in this community of people, 7.3, 7.4 billion people whether it's cyber, or the international monetary system, or weather, or disease, or climate change or habitat destruction, or if there's a nuclear war. For the first time in history we're all linked together. So there is a planetary quality to our politics, or there should be."''
 
:•''https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Planet_Citizens''
 
:•''https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Governor_Jerry_Brown''
 
 
[https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-jerry-brown-doomsday-20190124-story.html '''''Jerry Brown's warning with the Atomic Scientists''''']
 
''“The blindness and stupidity of the politicians and their consultants is truly shocking in the face of nuclear catastrophe,” Brown said. “We know that thousands of these weapons on high alert could be launched by mistake…. We are almost like travelers on the Titanic, seeing the iceberg up ahead but enjoying the elegant dining and the music.”''
 
''“The danger and probability is mounting that there will be some kind of nuclear incident that will kill millions, if not initiating exchanges that will kill billions.”''
 
 
 
[[File:Doomsday Clock - 2019.png|link=https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/01/24/opinions/doomsday-clock-two-minutes-to-midnight-brown-perry/index.html]]
 
 
:::'''''Re: the Risks of Nuclear Weapons @StrategicDemands, GreenPolicy360's associate
 
::::•''https://www.strategicdemands.com/bulletin-of-atomic-scientists-two-minutes/''
 
::::•''https://www.strategicdemands.com/dems-re-intro-bill-to-prevent-nuclear-first-use/''
 
::::•''https://www.strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/''
 
 
·····················································································
 
 
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons <big>'''Rethinking the Risks of Nuclear Weapons'''</big>]
 
 
[[File:A Nuclear first use hearing.png]]


[[File:National-Security.001.png]]


http://strategicdemands.com/nasa-pushes-earth-science-to-strengthen-security-capabilities/
···············································································


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


'''Moving to 2016'''
<big>'''''StratDem'''''</big>


<big>'''NASA Earth Sciences 2016 Budget No Longer to be Cut $500 Million'''</big>
:'''Visit GreenPolicy360's associate, Strategic Demands'''


The final budget bill provides $1.92 billion for Earth Science research, just $20 million less than the President's original budget request. The cut is slight compared to initial GOP budget cuts proposed in the House and Senate which had slashed as much as $500 million from the President's request.
:http://www.strategicdemands.com


NASA administrator Charles Bolden [http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security argued before Congress this summer and fall] that it was critical to increase the size of NASA's Earth Science programs.


Under the newly passed Fiscal Year 2016 NASA Budget, virtually all of the agency’s programs benefit with either full or added funding.


-- http://www.universetoday.com/123937/nasa-receives-significant-budget-boost-fiscal-year-2016/
:'''''[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:StratDem_Q3-Q4_2017.png Nuclear use?] What is it there for, if it can’t be used?'''''
   
   
○
:— ''The U.S. President''
 
 
::<big><big>'''<u>[[Nuclear Weapons]]</u>'''</big></big>
 
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/a-nuclear-meme/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-hair-trigger/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/?s=hairtrigger
 
 
 
[[File:StratDem Q3-Q4 2017.png]]
 
 
:::<font color=green>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font> <font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font>
 
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/stewards-of-the-apocalypse/
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/costsofwar/
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/oversight-us-nuclear-arsenal/
 
 
 
::::[[File:Hourglass-sand-2.jpg]]
 
 
 
:<big>'''Nedded Now: A New Vision Advancing Nuclear Non-proliferation'''</big>
 
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-weapons-treaty-adopted-historic-moment/
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/long-game-diplomacy-war/
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/status-nuclear-ban-negotiations/
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/the-trump-doctrine/
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/day-to-remember-june-1-2017/
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/the-way-of-war/
 
:• http://strategicdemands.com/eco-nomics-new-definitions-security/
 
 
 
::<font color=green>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font> <font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font>
 
 
<big>'''We Must Change our Vision of Security to International Cooperation'''</big>
 
<big>'''Strategies of Survival, 'Eco-nomics' and Sustainable Progress'''</big>
 
 
: <big><u>'''[[Green New Deal]]'''</u></big>
 
 
<big><big>National Security Shifts from Climate Science and Nuclear Weapons Control</big></big>
 
[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/18/trump-drop-climate-change-national-security-strategy '''''US President drops climate change from national security strategy''''']
 
''The U.S. stance represents a sharp change from the Obama administration’s national security strategy''
 
''Trump administration rejects international consensus on containing global warming and limiting nuclear weapons''
 
''U.S. turns away from leadership in the international community in clean energy and advocates a return to nuclear weapons dominance''
 
 
···································································
 
 
: <big><u>'''[[Climate News]]'''</u></big>
 
: <big><u>'''[[Earth Right Now]]'''</u></big>
 
: <big><u>'''[[Earth Science Vital Signs]]'''</u></big>
 
 
:<big><u>'''[[Earth Science Research from Space]]'''</u></big>
 
:<big><u>'''[[Earth and Space, Politics]]'''</u></big>
 
 
 
[[File:Earth from the ISS.gif]]
 
 
 
 
* [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics '''US Politics & Earth Science/Atmospheric Science''']
 
* [http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Observations '''Earth Observations''']
 
* [http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security '''Environmental Security''']
 
* [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Global_Security '''Global Security''']
 
 
 
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ  ---  Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
 
 
 
<big><big><big>'''''Responsibilities of Planet Citizens'''''</big></big></big>
 
 
: [http://www.planetcitizen.org '''www.planetcitizen.org''']
 
: [http://www.planetcitizens.org '''www.planetcitizens.org''']
 
 
 
[[File:Nuclear Threat Sept 19, 2017.png]]
 
 
 
'''SJS / GreenPolicy360 Siterunner''':
 
Over the decades in my political work, I have endeavored to develop "new definitions of national security."
 
 
'''Earth Systems Science, Environmental Security'''
 
[[Earth Day Memories on the 50th Anniversary]]
 
In the late 1960s, inspired by the nascent moments of the modern environmental movement with images from an Apollo mission of the Earth rising from beyond the moon,  [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earthrise a life-changing January 1969 cover of Life Magazine], and 'Whole Earth' realizations being shared for the first time, I began my involvement in larger strategic questions.
 
My initial political mentor [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/George_E._Brown_Jr George E. Brown] and new relationships with thoughtful figures such as [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons Dan Ellsberg] at Rand Institute in Santa Monica brought insight into war and peace and challenged me.
 
The opportunity to become involved in [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:USC_Daily_Trojan_Sen_Nelson_speech_day_after_first_Earth_Day_.jpg the first Earth Day] expanded my vision far beyond academic constraints and I began to explore connections between environmental security and international, global affairs.
 
Today the mission continues: To create a new security paradigm, a school of thought that identifies and advances contours of "real and resilient security".
 
 
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Strategic_Demands_of_the_21st_Century_A_New_Vision_for_a_New_World.png <big>'''Strategic Demands: A New Vision for a New World'''</big>]
 
: Security Brief prepared for the Green Institute by [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Roger_Morris_Bio Roger Morris] & [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/User_talk:Siterunner Steven Schmidt]
 
:: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Strategic_Demands '''Strategic Demands @ GreenPolicy360''']
 
 
:: Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ  ---  Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
 
 
[[File:New Definitions of National Security.png]]
 
 
'''Visit GreenPolicy's Associate -- [http://www.strategicdemands.com Strategic Demands]'''
 
 
* http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
 
 
'''US House of Representatives Says 'No' to Pentagon Prepping for Climate Impacts/Disruption'''
 
[http://strategicdemands.com/republicans-vote-to-block-national-security/ '''''Republicans in US Congress Vote to Block National & Global Security''''']
 
 
[[File:National-Security.001.png]]
 
 
http://strategicdemands.com/nasa-pushes-earth-science-to-strengthen-security-capabilities/
 
 
 
::[[File:Earth Day Flag.png]]
 
 


'''Reviewing 2015'''''
<big>'''Undercutting Security:'''</big>


; <big><big>Undercutting Security, US Congress Committees Move to Cut Earth Science Research</big></big>
'''2015/16, US Congress Attempts to Cut Earth Science Research'''


[http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics '''Earth and Space, Politics''']


[http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/05/01/house-science-committee-guts-nasa-earth-sciences-budget "House Science Committee guts NASA Earth sciences budget... attack on climate research and responses"]
[http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/05/01/house-science-committee-guts-nasa-earth-sciences-budget "House Science Committee guts NASA Earth sciences budget... attack on climate research and responses"]
Line 50: Line 1,065:
[http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/04/30/proposed-massive-cuts-to-nasa-earth-science-budget-draw-protest/ "Republicans in the House and Senate don't want NASA studying Earth..."]  
[http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/04/30/proposed-massive-cuts-to-nasa-earth-science-budget-draw-protest/ "Republicans in the House and Senate don't want NASA studying Earth..."]  


'''Earth Science, NASA Climate Change Research In Peril'''


[http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/04/30/nasa_budget_gop_committee_wants_to_slash_and_burn_earth_sciences.html "Slash and Burn Earth Sciences"]


Phil Plait: There’s no other way to put this, so I’ll be succinct: A passel of anti-science global warming denying GOP representatives have put together a funding authorization bill for NASA that at best cuts more than $300 million from the agency’s current Earth science budget. At worst? More than $500 million.
<big> '''Earth Science, NASA Climate Change Research Continues In Peril'''</big>
 
 
[http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/04/30/nasa_budget_gop_committee_wants_to_slash_and_burn_earth_sciences.html '''"Slash and Burn Earth Sciences"''']


In an op-ed in The Hill, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Texas, wrote that the GOP members of the committee didn't even give the writeup of the bill to Democrats on the committee until very late last week, indicating the GOP members are not operating in good faith on this issue.


○
○


Rep. Eddie Johnson: Despite the fact that in January NASA announced 2014 was likely the warmest year since 1880, it should come as no surprise that the majority wants to cut funding for climate science. Embarrassingly, just last week, every single Republican member of this committee present voted against the notion that climate change might be caused by people.
 
[https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/05/01/statement-ostp-director-john-p-holdren-house-proposed-funding-cuts-nasas-critical-ea '''Funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs?''']
 
 
''On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:''
 
'''''"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced...'''''
 
''The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth”—the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space.''
 
''NASA’s mission to observe, understand, and explore the solar system and the cosmos beyond has long been matched in importance by its mission to use the unrivaled vantage point of Earth orbit for looking downward, to better understand the only home that humanity currently has. It is difficult to understand why, at this time of U.S. leadership in both the outward-facing and inward-facing facets of NASA’s operations in space, the Congress would want to undermine that leadership and sacrifice the panoply of benefits it brings to the Nation."''
 
 
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:NASA '''Visit NASA Science @ GreenPolicy360''']
 
 
 
<big>····································</big>
 
 
 
; <big><big>Environmental Law</big></big>
 
 
'''Environmental Protections Nationally and Globally '''
 
 
: [https://www.carbonbrief.org/mapped-climate-change-laws-around-world <big><u>'''Climate Change Laws Around the World'''</u></big>]
 
: [http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Global-trends-in-climate-change-legislation-and-litigation-WEB.pdf <big><u>'''Trends in Climate Change Legislation'''</u></big>]
 
 
 
[[File:Earth Right Now.png]]
 
 
 
:*http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Right_Now
 
:* http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Observations
 
:* http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Science_from_Space
 
 
 
[[File:Blue green lines 1.png]]
 
 
 
'''National Security & Environmental Security: Editorial Opinion from GreenPolicy's Associate, Strategic Demands'''
 
(@StrategicDemands)
 
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/priorities-skew-away-from-nasa-and-security/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security-2/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/security-design/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/ground-truth/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/stratdem-factoid-re-road-security/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-national-security/
 
:* http://strategicdemands.com/speaking-environmental-security/
 
 
 
[[File:You can manage only what you can measure Dr David Crisp, OCO-2, June 2014 m.jpg]]
 
 
 
Tag: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Eco-nomics Eco-nomics], a 21st Century paradigm in development @GreenPolicy360
 
 
 
[[File:Line448x15.png]]
 
 
 
<big>'''''Multi-Sum Security: Five Distinct Dimensions'''''</big>
 
''Five discrete but overlapping dimensions of global security are discussed – including the oft-overlooked importance of transcultural security – to extend beyond the traditional, statecentric security paradigm.''
 
''Since the 1990s, there have been a number of attempts to broaden the conception of security beyond the purely state-centric model. A cooperative security concept was advanced in response to the realization that states needed to cooperate to tackle the multiple security challenges that were identified in the post-Cold War era. This concept suggested that national security was no longer just a national concern and called for enhanced cooperation between states.''
 
''http://www.css.ethz.ch/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/124192/pdf''
 


○
○


Rep Donna Edwards (D-Md.): '''[T]he bill puts at risk 10,000 jobs at Goddard and would have “huge, deep, lasting” impacts... “I will not stand by quietly and enable that to happen.”'''


Rep Donna F Edwards ‏@repdonnaedwards  Apr 30
''In the U.S., the world’s second-largest producer of greenhouse gases, [https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions transportation] makes up the largest share of emissions.''  
'''(2/2) My amendment to restore half a billion dollars in @NASA #EarthScience cuts defeated along party lines.'''


Rep Donna F Edwards ‏@repdonnaedwards  Apr 30
''Plugging in cars and trucks is a critical national challenge. [https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/10/where-americas-charge-towards-electric-vehicles-stands-today/572857/ How far has the U.S. progressed] in its move to electric vehicles and transportation networks?''
'''Disappointed that @HouseScience Committee leadership passed a partisan bill today which guts @NASA #EarthScience programs. (1/2)'''


○


[https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/05/01/statement-ostp-director-john-p-holdren-house-proposed-funding-cuts-nasas-critical-ea '''Re: funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs''']
• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Climate_News


On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:
• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Planet_Citizens


'''"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced.'''
• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Planet_Citizens


The bill’s cuts to space-technology development would not only risk continued U.S leadership in the space industry, but would also impede progress on precisely those technologies—on-orbit refueling, advanced space propulsion, radiation protection in deep space, and more—needed to make crewed missions to deep space a reality. In the absence of robust investments to bring these technologies into being, the goal of sending U.S. astronauts to Mars in the 2030s could be in jeopardy.
• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics


The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth”—the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space.
• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Research_from_Space


NASA’s mission to observe, understand, and explore the solar system and the cosmos beyond has long been matched in importance by its mission to use the unrivaled vantage point of Earth orbit for looking downward, to better understand the only home that humanity currently has. It is difficult to understand why, at this time of U.S. leadership in both the outward-facing and inward-facing facets of NASA’s operations in space, the Congress would want to undermine that leadership and sacrifice the panoply of benefits it brings to the Nation."


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
🌎


; <big><big>The Security Horizon</big></big>


'''National Security: Placed at Risk by Undercutting Environmental Security Policy & Practices'''
<big>'''[[Environmental Studies Online]]'''</big>


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics
: <big>'''[[Climate Problems, Climate Solutions]]'''</big>


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Research_from_Space
:: <big>'''[[ProjectDrawdownCO2]]'''</big>


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Vital_Signs


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Right_Now
🌎


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Observations


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Science_from_Space
<big>'''"EnviroSecurity"'''</big>


○
• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Envirosecurity


'''National Security & Environmental Security: Editorial Opinion from GreenPolicy's Associate, Strategic Demands'''


http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/
[[File:Ultimate Security-Environmental-Political.png]]


http://strategicdemands.com/priorities-skew-away-from-nasa-and-security/


http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/


http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security-2/


http://strategicdemands.com/security-design/
[[File:Environmental Security and a Thin Blue Layer around the Home Planet.png]]


http://strategicdemands.com/ground-truth/


http://strategicdemands.com/stratdem-factoid-re-road-security/


http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-national-security/
[[File:'Thin Blue Layer' of Earth's Atmosphere 2.jpg]]


http://strategicdemands.com/speaking-environmental-security/


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○




[[File:Western USA ISS-ScottKelly (08-10-15).jpg]]
🌎






[[Category:About Us]]
[[Category:Additional Website Resources - Linked Data - Green Best Practices]]
[[Category:Atmospheric Science]]
[[Category:Climate Change]]
[[Category:Climate Change]]
[[Category:Climate Policy]]
[[Category:Democracy]]
[[Category:Earth System Science]]
[[Category:Ecology Studies]]
[[Category:Eco-nomics]]
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Energy]]
[[Category:Energy Policy]]
[[Category:Environmental Protection]]
[[Category:Environmental Security]]
[[Category:Environmental Security]]
[[Category:Environmental Security, National Security]]
[[Category:Environmental Security, National Security]]
[[Category:Environmental Protection]]
[[Category:Envirosecurity]]
[[Category:Fossil Fuels]]
[[Category:Global Security]]
[[Category:Global Security]]
[[Category:Green Energy Initiatives]]
[[Category:Green Energy Initiatives]]
[[Category:Green Politics]]
[[Category:Health]]
[[Category:NASA]]
[[Category:National Security]]
[[Category:National Security]]
[[Category:Natural Resources]]
[[Category:New Definitions of National Security]]
[[Category:NOAA]]
[[Category:Nuclear Nonproliferation]]
[[Category:Nuclear Proliferation]]
[[Category:Nuclear Weapons]]
[[Category:Peace]]
[[Category:Planet Citizen]]
[[Category:Planet Citizen]]
[[Category:Planet Citizens]]
[[Category:Renewable Energy]]
[[Category:Renewable Energy]]
[[Category:Resilience]]
[[Category:Sea-Level Rise & Mitigation]]
[[Category:Strategic Demands]]
[[Category:Strategic Demands]]
[[Category:Sustainability Policies]]
[[Category:ThinBlueLayer]]
[[Category:Threat Multiplier]]
[[Category:US]]
[[Category:US Environmental Protection Agency]]
[[Category:US Environmental Protection Agency]]
[[Category:Whole Earth]]
[[Category:Digital Citizen]]
[[Category:Digital Rights]]
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:EOS eco Operating System]]
[[Category:Europe]]
[[Category:European Union]]
[[Category:Human Rights]]
[[Category:Internet]]
[[Category:Mobile Internet]]
[[Category:Online Education]]
[[Category:Online Privacy]]
[[Category:Planet API]]
[[Category:Planet Citizen]]
[[Category:Planet Citizens, Planet Scientists]]
[[Category:Privacy Rights]]
[[Category:World Wide Web]]

Latest revision as of 19:52, 22 September 2024

Over the Pacific August 2015.png

GreenPolicy360 / New Horizons of Security


New Definitions of Security -- Local, National, & Global Security

New Definitions of National Security.png


GreenPolicy360 & Strategic Demands / #StratDem


GreenPolicy360/StrategicDemands: The key to 21st century security is "strategic realism". Any full scientific assessment of security threats on the horizon is replete with environmental/global risks that are drawing daily into view. These risks are presenting a clear and present danger, in U.S. Department of Defense terms. A 'clear and present danger' has yet to be acknowledged by the US Department of Defense, or in the US military budget that approaches $1 trillion in annual spending. Other nations continue and are now escalating a weapons race that sees security in terms of defense/military spending. This cannot be sustained.



Strategic Demands of the 21st Century A New Vision for a New World.jpg

* https://greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Strategic_Demands_of_the_21st_Century_A_New_Vision_for_a_New_World.jpg


················································································


In Defense of Democracy and Freedom


• https://greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Democracy

• https://greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Human_Rights

• https://greenpolicy360.net/w/The_Commons


New definitions of security are demanded... forward planning with a new and more acutely aware vision of security.


GreenPolicy360 and its associate Strategic Demands challenge prevailing views that are not focused as they must be on existential threats of our era. A new vision of security must drive the politics of our times. New definitions of national and global security must become highest priorities.

The climate crisis is real. Severe eco-impacts are now being experienced by communities, local to national, as science is reporting with voluminous data warnings of a proliferating threat horizon.

Action is demanded in response. We must move climate and environmental impacts from 'irritants' to a central role as we rethink security risks. GreenPolicy360 and Strategic Demands point the way toward the new definitions, responses and solutions necessary for comprehensive, and sustainable security.


A Planet Citizen View.png

NASA


GreenPolicy360 Founder / Siterunner

New definitions of national and global security, new strategic priorities are necessary for a more rational defense of our larger security interests... It is critical to move beyond the failed national security policies of the past.


StratDem logo.png




🌎


2024


Facts about US Energy Use.jpg


How do Americans power their lives? Steve Ballmer breaks down the facts about US energy use, production, and environmental impact. Get the data right from US government sources.


Watch the Video and Read the 'Facts about US Energy' Transcript


About USAFacts

Steve Ballmer launched USAFacts.org in 2017, a not-for-profit organization whose goal is to allow people to understand U.S. government revenue, spending and societal impact. He is reported to have contributed $10 million to fund teams of researchers who populated the website's database with official data.


🌎


AI App, 'How Fast Is Renewable Energy Growing Statistically?'


"Grounding AI in reality with a little help from Data Commons"


Ground AI in Reality, a Renewable Energy case study.jpeg


* https://research.google/blog/grounding-ai-in-reality-with-a-little-help-from-data-commons/


🌎


IEA energy chart - 2023.jpg


2023


As the world transitions to renewable energy and wrests itself off decades of wars to control and secure fossil fuel sources, most visibly in the Mideast with its unsurpassed oil reserves and production, intermittent hopes for new horizons, and peace, have been crushed by generation-to-generation war.

October 2023 sees war again and, as the world watches in pain and shock with media reports streaming into every nation, we at GreenPolicy360 and our associate Strategic Demands recall the history and causes.


War and oil have been inextricably linked since the early 1900s and European military might transitioned from coal to oil. The newly discovered great oil fields in the Mideast led to a rush to control these essential strategic assets. The demand for oil to power industrialization is a story of the 20th century and for decades wars raged to own and control energy supplies emanating from this resource rich region.

Yet few realize the arc of these struggles and their costs passed forward. Now as another war is declared, one must acknowledge the costs and dangers of what is called "blowback", most notably by Chalmers Johnson in his books that have turned focus to the causes, costs and consequences of 100+ years of geopolitics, religion and revenge. Memories go back centuries and in modern times one can point to the British navy's transition of its warship fleet from coal to diesel oil, originating circa 1910 with Winston Churchill's decisions and Britain's military actions to control Iranian oil fields. This can be seen, generationally, as one in a generational nexus that have led to current Mideast conflicts. Iranian (Persian) oil powering the global British colonial power, a chessboard of Western nation moves to control oil/gas/fossil fuel-carbon resources in the region... and wars-begetting-wars, with an eye-for-an-eye biblical background and blowback operating and consequential dynamics.

The consequences of war are lasting and blowback should be taught in 'war colleges'.


"Perpetual war for perpetual peace" -- Not


·······················································································


Looking Back, Looking Forward, a first strategic briefing from Strategic Demands


Strategic Demands of the 21st Century: A New Vision for a New World

Spring 2005

Roger Morris and Steve Schmidt evoke history, envision political alternatives and offer a provocative reappraisal of national security policy in a swiftly changing world


America remains so unresponsive to the new challenges — the politics of foreign policy so corrupted and stifled, the public so misled — that a great national debate on national security is itself an urgent strategic imperative.

The moment requires bold innovative approaches to our interests and responsibilities on a drastically changed, swiftly changing planet. What we see as essential to a wide-ranging democratic discussion and debate is a new strategic discourse, addressing causes as well as effects. We must look ahead, envision and plan without illusion or compromising influence, recognize new realities, tell unpopular truths, put the national interest ahead of office, educate and act.

This paper, the first in a series outlining an alternative and comprehensive ‘national security’ vision, offers practical, constructive policies along with essential changes in the democratic politics and governance of national security that must accompany such an authentic and sustained policy change.


·········································································································


The overarching vision of "New Definitions of National Security" proposed by GreenPolicy360 and Strategic Demands looks away from orthodoxies professing perpetual war in a nuclear age as inevitable and rational. Constant war, hard power, 'might makes right', these beliefs are conventional and axiomatic in today's world, yet on a closer examination these concepts are 'Orwellian'. George Orwell's dictate "war is peace" is fallacy, and constant war (does not) bring constant peace. As Gore Vidal wrote of perpetual war after the September 11, 2001 terror attack on the World Trade Center, perpetual war does not bring perpetual peace.

The litany of failed orthodox beliefs is visibly producing generational conflict and arms races. Today's nuclear weapons race, which StratDem refers to as 2.0 and 3.0 'more usable and lethal' versions, the threat is extending to all nations and life on Earth.

Long overdue, it's dawning that new visions of security are essential. Realistically, this vision requires multi-national action to deliver new clean, renewable energy moving every nation away from fossil-fueled conflicts, wars and global climate disruption.

Positive change is possible, old ways and failed orthodoxies can be pushed aside.

Doors can be opened for a human rights agenda, environmental protection and quality of life.


Generation Green


Quality of Life


Commons-concepts permanent culture now.png


Environmental security and quality of life are essential to peace and well-being.


Climate Action Plans 360


············


2022


June 2022

GreenPolicy360: A tip of our hat to Bill McKibben, our former adviser and long-time friend, who points to a decision by the U.S. president to invoke the Defense Production Act as a signal that new definitions of national security are demanded as the nation attempts to move with speed and scale to renewable energy.

Let's look at the decision via two articles -- one, news and two, opinion.


Activists hail Biden’s use of security powers to boost clean energy

President invokes Defense Production Act to increase production of solar panels, building insulation and other equipment


Environmental groups have welcomed Joe Biden’s invoking of national security powers to rapidly expand the production of clean energy technology as a significant advance in the effort to curb dangerous climate breakdown.

Biden has triggered the Defense Production Act, a cold war-era law used to compel businesses to ramp up production of certain materials to aid national security, to boost the output of solar panels, building insulation, transformers for power grids and heat pumps, which are used to efficiently heat and cool homes.

The US president has also provided a two-year exemption to solar panel companies from tariffs on imported parts, easing the flow of technology from China and other countries for use in the US, a country where only 2.8% of electricity comes from solar power.

The moves have been applauded by climate activists who have pressed for Biden to use the breadth of his presidential powers to act on the climate crisis. Activists have sharply criticized the president in recent months over the continuing failure to pass major climate legislation through an evenly divided Senate...

The use of the Defense Production Act will allow the US Department of Energy to invest in companies that can build renewable energy facilities and manufacture parts for technology such as solar panels. The administration expects domestic solar manufacturing will now triple by 2024, allowing more than 3.3m homes each year to switch to solar energy.

A shift to cleaner sources of electricity would also help protect against energy bill volatility and provide efficiency to households, say proponents – heat pumps, for example, can save homes $1,000 each year from space heating alone. The administration has also sought to stress the benefits of weaning the US off the supply of fossil fuels from countries such as Russia. “Reducing America’s dependence on gas and oil is critical to US national security,” said Kathleen Hicks, deputy secretary of defense.


Enormous Thanks to All Who Helped Win a Big Heat Pump Victory Today

By Bill McKibben

June 6, 2022


Earlier today, President Biden signed the above order, which mandates the use of the 1950 Defense Production Act to sput the production of heat pumps, because, as he puts it in the text, “ensuring a robust, resilient, and sustainable domestic industrial base to meet the requirements of the clean energy economy is essential to our national security, a resilient energy sector, and the preservation of domestic critical infrastructure.”

Readers of this newsletter played a big role in making this happen. I broached the idea here on February 27, 3 days after the Ukraine invasion, in an article called Heat Pumps for Peace and Freedom. Within a couple of days, a group called Rewiring America had fleshed out the plan, and Third Act had begun to push it out across the country, getting older Americans to write letters by the score. Between you all, the effort paid off. Biden’s order isn’t precisely what we’d called for, since the heat pumps are destined for U.S. homes instead of European ones—but that may well be more politically palatable, and in any event, as we’ve pointed out over and over, oil is a global market. If we can suppress demand here by giving people efficient technology, it will help drive down the windfall that rising oil prices have provided Putin.

In any event, three cheers

One is for the Biden administration, which has done something admirable. I was talking to a Wall Street Journal reporter over the weekend, lamenting that Manchin had managed to bottle up the Biden climate program—this is a sign that the president’s team is finally uncorking that bottle. And they did it quickly—late February to early June is unprecedented speed in DC time.

A second is for Substack. As with most platforms, this one can be used for unpleasant infighting. But it also allows people to surface plans and ideas before they’re fully formed and vetted. If I had proposed that piece to some editor, they might well have said: ‘does anyone else care about this?” Which is the kind of smart and useful question that makes one happy to have editors. But sometimes it’s useful to be able to just get something out fast so that others can begin to react: if traditional journalism is the first draft of history, Substack in this fashion serves as the sketchbook for that first draft.

And the third cheer is for all of you. Ideas do absolutely no good unless lots of people get behind them and make noise. That’s what movements are—people making impossible things possible. I’m immensely grateful to everyone who wrote and pestered their politicians about this; it worked.

This single measure obviously doesn’t solve our problems, in Russia or in the atmosphere. But it’s a hopeful sign that we can still get something done. Stay tuned.

Subscribe to Bill McKibben on Substack


🌎


Climate Change Poses a Widening Threat to National Security.png

* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Climate_Migration

 

······································································································································


From GreenPolicy360's associate, Strategic Demands
* https://strategicdemands.com/eyes-on-the-global-security-threat

Eyes On Global Security Threats - via Strategic Demands April 2022.png


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ — Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ


Biden's (and the World's) Imperiled Climate Agenda


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ — Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ


May 2022


Nuclear Threats and Responses.png


The Russia - Ukraine War Continues Raising New Nuclear Risks
Visit GreenPolicy360's Associate 'Strategic Demands' for More...


April 2022


War in Ukraine Multiplies International Threats

Threatened Use of Nuclear Weapons in the News

Russia threats re nuclear weapons - Apr 17 2022.png


Russia threats re nuclear weapons (2) - Apr 17 2022.png


Ratcheting Up, New Nuclear Arms Race, Rapid Increasing in Weapons Budgets

U.S. Military Budget Analysts William Hartung and Julia Gledhill Examine the Numbers

April 17, 2022

Back in September 2008, Senator Joe Biden offered a bit of wisdom while running for vice president on Barack Obama's ticket. In a speech criticizing the Republican presidential campaign of senatorial colleague John McCain, he claimed to be quoting his own father when he said: "Show me your budget and I’ll tell you what you value."

... the next Pentagon budget, at an astronomical $813 billion dollars, is heading for passage by a humongous congressional majority. (To put that figure in perspective, it's $75 billion more than Donald Trump's last "defense" budget.) Worse yet, numerous representatives, particularly on the Republican side of the aisle, are already demanding yet more of the same. In fact, in think-tank Washington and beyond, there are now even calls for a future Pentagon budget that would top one trillion dollars annually. Imagine that, in a country already spending more on what's still called "national security" than the next 11 countries combined...


○


Profits of War - $14 Trillion - Read the Brown Univ-Watson Instit Report.PNG


Costs of War US Post 9-11 War Spending.jpg



Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ — Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ


Moving from the Quotidian to the Big Picture...


Environmental Security ↔ National Security


National Security: Enhanced via Environmental Security

@ Strategic Demands: "New Definitions of National Security"

@ GreenPolicy360: "New Definitions of National Security"


Environment and Security.jpg


Earth and Space, Politics 🌎
Climate News 🌎


2021


Upheaval in Central Asia Impacts the Future of Clean Energy Production?

'Rare Earth' Minerals & Mining Are Strategically Vital in EV Manufacturing


Rare Earths and EV Production


·································································


Climate Change US EPA.jpg


Climate and National Security.jpg


GreenPolicy360/Strategic Demands:


Earth System Observatory-2.jpg


 

Earth System Science

Earth System Observatory @StrategicDemands


More on Earth Science Missions

Earth Science Research from Space
New Definitions of National Security
@Earth360
OCO-2 / OCO-3
Earth Right Now
Earth Science Vital Signs


·············································


NASA - Global Climate Change

Images of Change


31 Vital Earth Signs

'Virtual signs' worsening

Tipping points, deepening disaster


Researchers, part of a group of more than 14,000 scientists who have signed on to an initiative declaring a worldwide climate emergency, said that governments had consistently failed to address the root cause of climate change: "the overexploitation of the Earth".

Of 31 "vital signs"—key metrics of planetary health that include greenhouse gas emissions, glacier thickness, sea-ice extent and deforestation—they found that 18 hit record highs or lows.


···························································


Annual Threat Assessment


"Cascading Challenges": Rumblings of a Shift in How the U.S. Assesses Security Threats


Senate Intelligence Committee’s Worldwide Threats Hearing

Via the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS)

April 2021


This annual report of worldwide threats to the national security of the United States responds to Section 617 of the FY21 Intelligence Authorization Act (P.L. 116-260). This report reflects the collective insights of the Intelligence Community(IC), which is committed every day to providing the nuanced, independent, and unvarnished intelligence that policymakers, war fighters, and domestic law enforcement personnel need to protect American lives and America’s interests anywhere in the world.This assessment focuses on the most direct, serious threats to the United States during the next year. The order of the topics presented in this assessment does not necessarily indicate their relative importance or the magnitude of the threats in the view of the IC. All require a robust intelligence response, including those where a near-term focus may help head off greater threats in the future, such as climate change and environmental degradation.


What did Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines mean when she said the United States should “broaden our definition of national security?”


The Annual Threat Assessment (ATA) and following hearings devoted time to discuss the Covid-19 pandemic and climate change. While the IC has long had in-house experts exploring the national security implications of health issues and environmental pressures, both are generally considered as irritants giving rise to core national security considerations like political instability or resource-based conflict rather than national security issues in and of themselves. (boldface added) Director Haines seems to be advocating for a more central role for issues like these in the IC’s work.

And this is the rub: the world is big and complex, there is more data to read than any human can read, and many of the issues are intertwined. This is what the IC means by “cascading” challenges — a global pandemic is not merely a public health issue—it also causes economic disruption that can lead to migration and political destabilization, and the indicators providing warning of these threats are not stealable secrets. Sorting the signal from the noise in a world with a lot of noise is the central challenge for the IC, and it will need transformative reform, including massive computing resources and artificial intelligence and machine learning assistance, to make sense of it.


··························


Avril Haines was sworn in as the Director of National Intelligence on January 21, 2021. She is the seventh Senate-confirmed DNI in our nation’s history and the first woman to lead the U.S. Intelligence Community.

Office of the Director of National Intelligence

By statute, the DNI is the principal intelligence adviser to the President, and determines and manages the National Intelligence Program (NIP) budget of more than $50 billion, the U.S. government’s total intelligence spending aside from military intelligence. The DNI is also tasked with integrating the efforts of the 17 elements of the Intelligence Community (IC).


○


April 19, 2021


International Climate Meeting Online

At the invitation of the new US president, nations gathered this week in a virtual climate summit to share their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) toward solving the climate change crisis.

We, GreenPolicy360 with our associate Strategic Demands, will cover news of the climate conference, both good and bad. Our several decades of pushing for immediate, concerted action and 'New Definitions of National Security' by all nations is front of stage, and confronted by old definitions of security, conflicts and wars, that take our eyes off of the existential challenges of climate -- and a resurgent, escalating nuclear weapons threat.

Here, in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, we look at a key group of experts sounding the alarm about both climate disaster and nuclear war.

They are the great challenges of our time and must given a spotlight and focus of our citizen action.


By most accounts, President-Elect Biden looks to position climate change as a central organizing principle in his Executive Branch. Through cabinet appointments of sympathetic experts at agencies not normally at the fore of environmental policy—such as Treasury, Justice, and Transportation—Biden hopes to deliver wide-ranging wins on climate policy. The EPA, the Energy Department, and the Interior Department will be redeployed in Obama-era roles as key instruments for aggressive climate action. These would all be positive steps forward.


·····················································································································


Survey Finds Overwhelming International Support for Greater Environmental Protection

“We live in a time of polarisation, and environmental issues have long embodied the political divisions in society. However, this may be changing. We can see an overwhelming consensus emerging for greater government-led action to protect the environment in major nations.”


 

Renewable Energy potential 2021.jpg


·······················································································································


Acknowledging a Profound Shift in U.S. Security Policy

Biden administration accelerates out of the starting gate

GreenPolicy360:

Yes, a redefinition of U.S. national (and global) security is now being envisioned. GreenPolicy360's point of view on the strategic demand for a new 21st century vision is taking place. The new U.S. Biden administration with governing leadership, executive orders, and promised follow-on legislative actions, is making a strong push to redefine real security. New definitions, new vision, operational multi-front action is 'in the works'...


Here, Michael E. Mann begins to capture the moment in a USA Today opinion:

Now, Biden is gathering his council to assess the current and future dangers in this fight, including all 17 intelligence agencies; a general on the international front, John Kerry, who will also have a seat on the National Security Council and will direct our diplomatic efforts abroad; and another general on the domestic front, former Environmental Protection Agency administrator Gina McCarthy, who will coordinate climate action in the homeland. 


PART I — PUTTING THE CLIMATE CRISIS AT THE CENTER OF UNITED STATES FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY


Section 101. Policy. United States international engagement to address climate change — which has become a climate crisis — is more necessary and urgent than ever. The scientific community has made clear that the scale and speed of necessary action is greater than previously believed. There is little time left to avoid setting the world on a dangerous, potentially catastrophic, climate trajectory. Responding to the climate crisis will require both significant short-term global reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and net-zero global emissions by mid-century or before.

It is the policy of my Administration that climate considerations shall be an essential element of United States foreign policy and national security. The United States will work with other countries and partners, both bilaterally and multilaterally, to put the world on a sustainable climate pathway. The United States will also move quickly to build resilience, both at home and abroad, against the impacts of climate change that are already manifest and will continue to intensify according to current trajectories.

Sec. 102. Purpose. This order builds on and reaffirms actions my Administration has already taken to place the climate crisis at the forefront of this Nation’s foreign policy and national security planning...

More


○


Biden Team 'Hits the Ground Running'

Climate change ..... "an existential threat"...


President Biden steps up:

The executive order I’ll be signing establishes a White House Office of Domestic Climate Policy. And it’ll be led by one of America’s most distinguished climate leaders, former EPA Director Gina McCarthy. As the head of the new office and my National Climate Advisor, Gina will chair a National Climate Task Force, made up of many members of our Cabinet, to deliver a whole-of-government approach to the climate crisis.

(T)he whole-of-government approach is necessary... We’re going to work with mayors and governors and tribal leaders and business leaders who are stepping up, and the young people organizing and leading the way. My message to those young people is: You have the full capacity and power of the federal government. Your government is going to work with you.

... a new, modern-day Civilian Climate Corps ...

Look, this executive order I’m signing today also makes it official that climate change will be at the center of our national security and foreign policy...

Actionable solutions, not pie-in-the-sky dreams... it is not time for small measures; we need to be bold...

(T)oday’s executive order will help strengthen that commitment by working with other nations to support the most vulnerable to the impact of climate change and to increase our collective resilience. That includes a summit of world leaders that I’ll convene to address this climate crisis on Earth Day, this year.

In order to establish a new effort to integrate the security implications of climate change as part of our national security and risk assessment and analysis will also be included.

Earlier this month, I nominated Dr. Eric Lander, a brilliant scientist who is here today, to be the Director of the Office of Science and Technology. I also nominated another brilliant scientist, Dr. Frances Arnold and Dr. Maria Zuber, to co-chair the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology...

More


············


2020


Biden selects Kerry as special climate envoy.jpg


November 23, 2020


U.S. President Elect Selects John Kerry as International Climate 'Envoy'

First-ever Climate Security Position Created by Biden
Kerry to Join National Security Council with Presidential Cabinet-level Status


GreenPolicy360 & Strategic Demands applaud this historic, critically important shift in the U.S. policy and vision

For years GreenPolicy360 and StratDem have advocated Climate Policy become a U.S. National/Global Security priority


New Definitions of National & Global Security


·················································································


President-elect Biden planning to leave the Trump years of climate change denial behind

The incoming U.S. president pledges to act fast, to rejoin the international Paris climate agreement on his first day in office and immediately flex a muscular, aggressive program of climate actions


Joe Biden - European news.png


··············································································


Nationalism and Division: U.S. Reputation and Status Continues to Decline in the Eyes of the World


Poor ratings for US 2020.jpg


····························································································


This App Could Be a Game Changer

This could be a very big deal

There’s an old truism in the business world: what gets measured gets managed. One of the challenges in managing the greenhouse gas emissions warming the atmosphere is that they aren’t measured very well.

“Currently, most countries do not know where most of their emissions come from,” says Kelly Sims Gallagher, a professor of energy and environmental policy at Tufts University’s Fletcher School. “Even in advanced economies like the United States, emissions are estimated for many sectors.” Without this information “you cannot devise smart and effective policies to mitigate emissions,” she says, and “you cannot track them to see if you are making progress against your goals.”


Measure to Manage

You can manage only what you can measure Dr David Crisp, OCO-2, June 2014 m.jpg


The ultimate solution to this problem — the killer app, as it were — would be real-time tracking of all global greenhouse gases, verified by objective third parties, and available for free to the public.

Now, a new alliance of climate research groups called the Climate TRACE (Tracking Real-Time Atmospheric Carbon Emissions) Coalition has launched an effort to make the vision a reality, and they’re aiming to have it ready for COP26, the climate meetings in Glasgow, Scotland, in November 2021 (postponed from November 2020). If they pull it off, it could completely change the tenor and direction of international climate talks.


························································


Big Green / Renewable Energy Storage Solutions

Being Engineered for Tomorrow's World


···································································································


Climate Models.png


2019


Moving Past a World of Wars to Control Petro-Resources


Rebecca Solnit in The Guardian / October 2019: To define the climate movement as a peace movement means defining the wars it seeks to end. They have been filthy, brutal and corrosive. We can do better. We can move past fossil fuel. We can take back power, both political and literal energy-generating power, from these inhuman entities that have dominated much of the earth for a century. We, civil society, we who get poisoned and killed and we who have built a great and powerful climate movement, can make peace, with our energy sources, with our planet and with each other.


··············································


Existential Language

Capturing the Seriousness, the Challenge, and the Crisis


Via The Guardian / May 17, 2019

The Guardian has updated its style guide to introduce terms that more accurately describe the environmental crises facing the world.

Instead of “climate change” the preferred terms are “climate emergency, crisis or breakdown” and “global heating” is favoured over “global warming”, although the original terms are not banned.

“We want to ensure that we are being scientifically precise, while also communicating clearly with readers on this very important issue,” said the editor-in-chief, Katharine Viner. “The phrase ‘climate change’, for example, sounds rather passive and gentle when what scientists are talking about is a catastrophe for humanity.”

“Increasingly, climate scientists and organisations from the UN to the Met Office are changing their terminology, and using stronger language to describe the situation we’re in.”

The United Nations secretary general, António Guterres, talked of the “climate crisis” in September, adding: “We face a direct existential threat.” The climate scientist Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, a former adviser to Angela Merkel, the EU and the pope, also uses “climate crisis”. Advertisement

In December, Prof Richard Betts, who leads the Met Office’s climate research, said “global heating” was a more accurate term than “global warming” to describe the changes taking place to the world’s climate. In the political world, UK MPs recently endorsed the Labour party’s declaration of a “climate emergency”.

The scale of the climate and wildlife crises has been laid bare by two landmark reports from the world’s scientists. In October, they said carbon emissions must halve by 2030 to avoid even greater risks of drought, floods, extreme heat and poverty for hundreds of millions of people. In May, global scientists said human society was in jeopardy from the accelerating annihilation of wildlife and destruction of the ecosystems that support all life on Earth.

Other terms that have been updated, including the use of “wildlife” rather than “biodiversity”, “fish populations” instead of “fish stocks” and “climate science denier” rather than “climate sceptic”. In September, the BBC accepted it gets coverage of climate change “wrong too often” and told staff: “You do not need a ‘denier’ to balance the debate.”

Earlier in May, Greta Thunberg, the Swedish teenager who has inspired school strikes for climate around the globe, said: “It’s 2019. Can we all now call it what it is: climate breakdown, climate crisis, climate emergency, ecological breakdown, ecological crisis and ecological emergency?”

 


Michael E Mann -- act with hope not fear.jpg


························································

 

Strategic Demands

A New Vision by Roger Morris & Steven Schmidt

Surviving Victory: Security Priorities

 

Revisiting the Foundation of StrategicDemands.com


Strategic Demands of the 21st Century A New Vision for a New World.png


Strategic Demands of the 21st Century (PDF) / Published 2005


Strategic Demands: Ominous 2019


• https://www.strategicdemands.com/carnegie-nuclear-policy-conference/

• https://www.strategicdemands.com/regional-nuclear-conflict-global-nuclear-catastrophe/

• https://www.strategicdemands.com/global-security-fears-climate-and-u-s/

• https://www.strategicdemands.com/back-to-the-brink-nuclear-catastrophe/

• https://www.strategicdemands.com/dems-re-intro-bill-to-prevent-nuclear-first-use/

• https://www.strategicdemands.com/bulletin-of-atomic-scientists-two-minutes/

• https://www.strategicdemands.com/nukes-nuking-nuked/

• https://www.strategicdemands.com/kcna-re-denuclearization/

• https://www.strategicdemands.com/hello-down-there/


·················································································


Jerry Brown Joins with The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

California Governor Jerry Brown to focus on 'existential threats', climate and nuclear weapons, as his fourth term in office draws to a close and his next chapter of life begins:

"I'm a planetary realist. We are linked in this community of people, 7.3, 7.4 billion people whether it's cyber, or the international monetary system, or weather, or disease, or climate change or habitat destruction, or if there's a nuclear war. For the first time in history we're all linked together. So there is a planetary quality to our politics, or there should be."

•https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Planet_Citizens
•https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Governor_Jerry_Brown


Jerry Brown's warning with the Atomic Scientists

“The blindness and stupidity of the politicians and their consultants is truly shocking in the face of nuclear catastrophe,” Brown said. “We know that thousands of these weapons on high alert could be launched by mistake…. We are almost like travelers on the Titanic, seeing the iceberg up ahead but enjoying the elegant dining and the music.”

“The danger and probability is mounting that there will be some kind of nuclear incident that will kill millions, if not initiating exchanges that will kill billions.”


Doomsday Clock - 2019.png


Re: the Risks of Nuclear Weapons @StrategicDemands, GreenPolicy360's associate
•https://www.strategicdemands.com/bulletin-of-atomic-scientists-two-minutes/
•https://www.strategicdemands.com/dems-re-intro-bill-to-prevent-nuclear-first-use/
•https://www.strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/


·····················································································


Rethinking the Risks of Nuclear Weapons


A Nuclear first use hearing.png


···············································································


StratDem

Visit GreenPolicy360's associate, Strategic Demands
http://www.strategicdemands.com


Nuclear use? What is it there for, if it can’t be used?
— The U.S. President


Nuclear Weapons



StratDem Q3-Q4 2017.png


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


• http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/
• http://strategicdemands.com/stewards-of-the-apocalypse/
• http://strategicdemands.com/costsofwar/
• http://strategicdemands.com/oversight-us-nuclear-arsenal/


Hourglass-sand-2.jpg


Nedded Now: A New Vision Advancing Nuclear Non-proliferation


• http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-weapons-treaty-adopted-historic-moment/
• http://strategicdemands.com/long-game-diplomacy-war/
• http://strategicdemands.com/status-nuclear-ban-negotiations/
• http://strategicdemands.com/the-trump-doctrine/
• http://strategicdemands.com/day-to-remember-june-1-2017/
• http://strategicdemands.com/the-way-of-war/
• http://strategicdemands.com/eco-nomics-new-definitions-security/


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


We Must Change our Vision of Security to International Cooperation

Strategies of Survival, 'Eco-nomics' and Sustainable Progress


Green New Deal


National Security Shifts from Climate Science and Nuclear Weapons Control

US President drops climate change from national security strategy

The U.S. stance represents a sharp change from the Obama administration’s national security strategy

Trump administration rejects international consensus on containing global warming and limiting nuclear weapons

U.S. turns away from leadership in the international community in clean energy and advocates a return to nuclear weapons dominance


···································································


Climate News
Earth Right Now
Earth Science Vital Signs


Earth Science Research from Space
Earth and Space, Politics


Earth from the ISS.gif




Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ --- Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ


Responsibilities of Planet Citizens


www.planetcitizen.org
www.planetcitizens.org


Nuclear Threat Sept 19, 2017.png


SJS / GreenPolicy360 Siterunner:

Over the decades in my political work, I have endeavored to develop "new definitions of national security."


Earth Systems Science, Environmental Security

Earth Day Memories on the 50th Anniversary

In the late 1960s, inspired by the nascent moments of the modern environmental movement with images from an Apollo mission of the Earth rising from beyond the moon, a life-changing January 1969 cover of Life Magazine, and 'Whole Earth' realizations being shared for the first time, I began my involvement in larger strategic questions.

My initial political mentor George E. Brown and new relationships with thoughtful figures such as Dan Ellsberg at Rand Institute in Santa Monica brought insight into war and peace and challenged me.

The opportunity to become involved in the first Earth Day expanded my vision far beyond academic constraints and I began to explore connections between environmental security and international, global affairs.

Today the mission continues: To create a new security paradigm, a school of thought that identifies and advances contours of "real and resilient security".


Strategic Demands: A New Vision for a New World

Security Brief prepared for the Green Institute by Roger Morris & Steven Schmidt
Strategic Demands @ GreenPolicy360


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ --- Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ


New Definitions of National Security.png


Visit GreenPolicy's Associate -- Strategic Demands



US House of Representatives Says 'No' to Pentagon Prepping for Climate Impacts/Disruption

Republicans in US Congress Vote to Block National & Global Security


National-Security.001.png


http://strategicdemands.com/nasa-pushes-earth-science-to-strengthen-security-capabilities/


Earth Day Flag.png


Undercutting Security:

2015/16, US Congress Attempts to Cut Earth Science Research


"House Science Committee guts NASA Earth sciences budget... attack on climate research and responses"

"Republicans in the House and Senate don't want NASA studying Earth..."


Earth Science, NASA Climate Change Research Continues In Peril


"Slash and Burn Earth Sciences"


○


Funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs?


On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:

"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced...

The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth”—the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space.

NASA’s mission to observe, understand, and explore the solar system and the cosmos beyond has long been matched in importance by its mission to use the unrivaled vantage point of Earth orbit for looking downward, to better understand the only home that humanity currently has. It is difficult to understand why, at this time of U.S. leadership in both the outward-facing and inward-facing facets of NASA’s operations in space, the Congress would want to undermine that leadership and sacrifice the panoply of benefits it brings to the Nation."


Visit NASA Science @ GreenPolicy360


····································


Environmental Law


Environmental Protections Nationally and Globally


Climate Change Laws Around the World
Trends in Climate Change Legislation


Earth Right Now.png



Blue green lines 1.png


National Security & Environmental Security: Editorial Opinion from GreenPolicy's Associate, Strategic Demands

(@StrategicDemands)



You can manage only what you can measure Dr David Crisp, OCO-2, June 2014 m.jpg


Tag: Eco-nomics, a 21st Century paradigm in development @GreenPolicy360


Line448x15.png


Multi-Sum Security: Five Distinct Dimensions

Five discrete but overlapping dimensions of global security are discussed – including the oft-overlooked importance of transcultural security – to extend beyond the traditional, statecentric security paradigm.

Since the 1990s, there have been a number of attempts to broaden the conception of security beyond the purely state-centric model. A cooperative security concept was advanced in response to the realization that states needed to cooperate to tackle the multiple security challenges that were identified in the post-Cold War era. This concept suggested that national security was no longer just a national concern and called for enhanced cooperation between states.

http://www.css.ethz.ch/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/124192/pdf


○


In the U.S., the world’s second-largest producer of greenhouse gases, transportation makes up the largest share of emissions.

Plugging in cars and trucks is a critical national challenge. How far has the U.S. progressed in its move to electric vehicles and transportation networks?


• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Climate_News

• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Planet_Citizens

• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Planet_Citizens

• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics

• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Research_from_Space


🌎


Environmental Studies Online

Climate Problems, Climate Solutions
ProjectDrawdownCO2


🌎


"EnviroSecurity"

• https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Envirosecurity


Ultimate Security-Environmental-Political.png



Environmental Security and a Thin Blue Layer around the Home Planet.png


'Thin Blue Layer' of Earth's Atmosphere 2.jpg



🌎

Retrieved from "https://greenpolicy360.net/index.php?title=New_Definitions_of_National_Security&oldid=124789"