Category:Ecological Economics

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<addthis />


Commons-concepts permanent culture now.png

Eco-nomics & Ecological Economics

Ecological economics vs. Conventional economics

Ecological economics is a growing transdisciplinary field that aims to improve and expand economic theory to integrate the earth’s natural systems, human values and human health and well-being. In conventional economics, the primary goal is to increase goods and services produced by human industries (built capital), and the gross domestic product (GDP) is a national measure of the total value of goods and services produced annually. Conventional economics assumes that ever-increasing GDP is desirable, possible, and that everyone benefits.

Ecological economics takes a broader perspective and recognizes that there are more things that contribute to human well-being than just the amount of stuff, such as health and education (human capital), friends and family (social capital) and the contribution of the earth and its biological and physical systems (natural capital). Its goal is to develop a deeper scientific understanding of the complex linkages between human and natural systems, and to use that understanding to develop effective policies that will lead to a world which is ecologically sustainable, has a fair distribution of resources (both between groups and generations of humans and between humans and other species), and efficiently allocates scarce resources including “natural” and “social” capital...

Natural capital is a traditional and re-emerging view that recognizes the importance and value of the goods and services provided by nature. It goes beyond the traditional consideration of natural products as raw materials for conversion into goods (trees into houses or paper) to consider functions that are provided by planetary systems (breathable air, a stable climate) or local ecosystems (flood protection by coastal wetlands, and drinking water purification by forests). Sometimes the monetary value of these ecosystem services can be calculated, such as the cost to replace them with built capital (coastal wetlands with levees). However, some natural services are priceless. They are essential for life, and irreplaceable (breathable air)...

What is sustainability and how does it relate to Ecological Economics?

Ecological economics reminds us that "sustainability" is a multi-faceted goal by focusing on the complex interrelationship between different elements of sustainability: ecological sustainability, social sustainability and economic sustainability. It reminds us of the complexity of the many interacting systems that make up the biosphere and the uncertainty that is a fundamental characteristic of all complex systems. Ecological economics is concerned with the problem of assuring sustainability in the face of uncertainty, and aims to maintain the resilience of ecological and socioeconomic systems by conserving and investing in natural, social and human assets.

Ecological economics, as Green Policy360 sees it, seeks 'true cost' economic efficiency.

Economic efficiency and good economic decision making are not possible if all of the costs and benefits are not considered or included in prices. Often current market prices do not capture the full costs of an economic activity that depletes resources or damages natural systems (natural capital); or inflicts costs to human health and well-being (social and human capitals) caused by pollution or other side effects of the activity. These excluded costs are called "externalities", defined as costs that are not included in the price of the product but are shouldered by a third party, outside the producer/seller and buyer/consumer. Capture of these costs in the market would provide a powerful incentive to move towards sustainability.

Green Party Platform - true-cost pricing / sustainability


Economics/Eco-nomics: Real World Challenges & Opportunities

Environmentalism – Multidisciplinary Ecological Economics

Environmental economics, the economics of natural resources, sustainable development, green economics, sustainability science, bioeconomics, ecodevelopment: the disciplines and concepts situated at the crossroads of environmentalism and economics are many. This article examines “ecological economics,” a field that has achieved academic recognition and launched numerous debates...


Environmental economics, the economics of natural resources, sustainable development, green economics, sustainability science, bioeconomics, ecodevelopment, etc...

There are many different perspectives from which economics considers the environment... Environmental economics has emerged recently, now with thousands of researchers across the globe...

The founding of the ISEE (International Society for Ecological Economics) in 1988 and of the journal Ecological Economics in 1989 have given the field stature.

Ecological economics is often seen as related to environmental and natural resource economics... Its relationship with neoclassical environmental economics is the subject of debate and the distinction between weak and strong sustainability is often seen as the dividing line between environmental economics and ecological economics...

No economist who adheres to ecological economics accepts the hypothesis that natural capital can be substituted (depleted) ad infinitum or that “backstop technologies” (accelerated growth) can solve the problem of scarcity.

Ecological economics is perhaps best characterized by diversity and plurality. It borrows from “standard” economics, institutional economics, post-Keynesian economics, scientific ecology, environmental ethics, and environmental history. For ecological economics, the common denominator between these approaches is an effort to understand the relationship between economic systems and ecosystems.

Ecological economics essential traits are an interest in nature, justice, and time, all of which are overlooked by standard economics.

Perhaps more than other disciplines aspiring to be sciences, environmental ecologists have developed normative frameworks at the same time as they have constructed analytical tools. The field is constantly developing and interrogating concepts with a normative tenor, such as “sustainability,” “resilience,” and “environmental assessment.”


Ecological economics/eco-economics refers to both a transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary field of academic research that aims to address the interdependence and coevolution of human economies and natural ecosystems over time and space. It is distinguished from environmental economics, which is the mainstream economic analysis of the environment, by its treatment of the economy as a subsystem of the ecosystem and its emphasis upon preserving natural capital. One survey of German economists found that ecological and environmental economics are different schools of economic thought, with ecological economists emphasizing strong sustainability and rejecting the proposition that natural capital can be substituted by human-made capital.

Ecological economics was founded as a modern movement in the works of and interactions between various European and American academics (see the section on history and development below). The related field of green economics is, in general, a more politically applied form of the subject.

According to ecological economist Malte Faber, ecological economics is defined by its focus on nature, justice, and time. Issues of intergenerational equity, irreversibility of environmental change, uncertainty of long-term outcomes, and sustainable development guide ecological economic analysis and valuation. Ecological economists have questioned fundamental mainstream economic approaches such as cost-benefit analysis, and the separability of economic values from scientific research, contending that economics is unavoidably normative rather than positive (i.e. descriptive). Positional analysis, which attempts to incorporate time and justice issues, is proposed as an alternative. Ecological economics shares many of its perspectives with feminist economics, including the focus on sustainability, nature, justice and care values.

Some key concepts of what is now ecological economics are evident in the writings of E.F. Schumacher, whose book Small Is Beautiful – A Study of Economics as if People Mattered (1973) was published just a few years before the first edition of Herman Daly's comprehensive and persuasive Steady-State Economics (1977). Other figures include ecologists C.S. Holling, H.T. Odum and Robert Costanza, biologist Gretchen Daily and physicist Robert Ayres. CUNY geography professor David Harvey explicitly added ecological concerns to political economic literature. This parallel development in political economy has been continued by analysts such as sociologist John Bellamy Foster.



Anthropocene bks016.png

The Birth of the Anthropocene by Jeremy Davies

Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism by Elmar Altvater, Eileen C. Crist, Donna J. Haraway, Daniel Hartley, Christian Parenti, and Justin McBrien -- Jason W. Moore (Editor)

Facing the Anthropocene: Fossil Capitalism and the Crisis of the Earth System by Ian Angus

After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene by Jedediah Purdy

The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us by Christophe Bonneuil & Jean-Baptiste Fressoz


SJS / Siterunner: An eventful debate is underway. The academic version of the debate speaks of political economy, macro/micro-economics, and classic versus contemporary economics.

An alternative approach, one that speaks of "greening economics" and a new field of "eco-nomics" looks to improve economics as eco-nomics.

Green politics is exploring the contradictions and costs of economic "business-as-usual" -- from the financial services industry and 'too big to fail' subsidization to 'money in politics' and its impact on foreign and domestic policy, war spending and national debt, falling income and collapsing infrastructure. At the business org level, new ideas are being interjected into day-to-day planning and operations, ideas as in 'sustainability', 'energy efficiency', 'direct participation of shareholders/stakeholders' and a diverse set of green eco-solutions with both short- and long-term vision.

One of the leading Green economic thinkers is Richard Wolff, a founding member of the Green Party of New Haven, Connecticut, and its mayoral candidate in 1985.

Here he speaks of the study of economic systems from a classic point of view and the New School of Social Research (where your GreenPolicy siterunner studied graduate economics.

New School for Social Research)

Richard D Wolff, Professor of Economics Emeritus -- University of Massachusetts-Amherst / Graduate Faculty, New School, New York

Richard Wolff in a 2013 interview:

"[E]verything you expect about how the world works probably will be changed in your life, that unexpected things happen, often tragic things happen, and being flexible, being aware of a whole range of different things that happen in the world, is not just a good idea as a thinking person, but it’s crucial to your survival.

New economics via Robert Pollin of the New School for Social Research, an important contributor to what we now see as a paradigm of green eco-nomic thought as developed by your GreenPolicy360 siterunner and in the economic thought of the founding US Green Party platform.

Greening the Global Economy Robert Pollin.jpg

Read More: (2012) (2012) (2012 - with Stephen Resnick) (2013) (2016)


'Ecological Economics': An emerging paradigm

Sustainable economies, a new interdisciplinary framework that embraces the linkages among economic growth, environmental degradation, and social inequity.


'Eco-nomics': A New Green Political Economy



Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington DC

Center for Popular Economics, Amherst, MA

Dollars & Sense, Somerville, MA

Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University

Political Economy Research Institute, UMass, Amherst

Progressive Economics Think Tanks

SJS / Siterunner: Again, looking back to the Graduate Faculty of the New School in New York, to David M Gordon, who passed away at a young age in 1996. David spoke of long-term economics and coined the phrase “social structure of accumulation” (SSA) that speaks of the need to consider multi-generation impacts of economic activity. Let's look back -- and forward -- at a number of these ideas with Thomas Weisskopf who contributes in 2014 to the David Gordon Memorial Lecture --- Reflections on 50 Years of Radical Political Economy. The concept of 'radical' speaks of alternatives to neoclassic/neoliberal economics as new threads emerge responding to economic and environmental challenges.

More from the New School for Social Research / Political Economy-Liberal Studies-History of Ideas (1970-2000)
Gordon, David M. with Bowles, Samuel, "Beyond the Waste Land: A Democratic Alternative to Economic Decline" (1983) -
Gordon, David M. with Bowles, Samuel; Weisskopf, Thomas E. "After the Waste Land: Democratic Economics for the Year 2000 (1990) -

Publications of David Gordon Memorial Lecture Series -

Center for American Progress

Economic Policy Institute

Institute for New Economic Thinking

Institute for Policy Studies

New America Foundation


The second generation of ecological economics: How far has the apple fallen from the tree?

Ecological economics was first created as a forum providing space for criticizing 'normal science, i.e. science based on an oversimplification of complex issues and aiming at predictions.

The paper analyzes 6237 abstracts of articles published in four journals since 1989.
Scientific discourse produced in ecological economics has evolved.
Ecological economics discourse is converging toward environmental economics.
The valuation of ecosystem services discourse has become central in ecological economics.
The prevalence of pragmatism in the field and in the editorial boards exlains this trend.

More on Ecological Economics

Arrow, J. K., (1951), Social Choice and Individual Values, Yale University Press.
Baumgärtner, S., Quaas, M., (2010), “Sustainability Economics: General versus Specific, and Conceptual versus Practical,” Ecological Economics, 69, pp. 2056-2059.
Bromley, D. W., (1990), “The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 19, pp. 86-107.
Costanza, R., (1989), “What is Ecological Economics?”, Ecological Economics, 1, pp. 1-7.
Hodgson, G. M., (2010), “Darwinian Coevolution of Organizations and the Environment,” Ecological Economics, 69, pp. 700-706.
Spash, C., (2009), “Social Ecological Economics,” CSIRO Working Paper Series 2009-08, June 2009.

Common, M., S. Stagl, (2005), Ecological Economics: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, 592 p.
Costanza, R. (ed.), (1991), Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, Columbia University Press, New York.
Costanza, R., et John Cumberland, Herman Daly, Robert Goodland, Richard Norgaard, “An Introduction to Ecological Economics (e-book)”, in Encyclopedia of Earth. Eds. Cutler J. Cleveland, Washington, D.C.: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment).
Daly, H., J. Farley, (2010), Ecological Economics, second edition: Principles and Applications, Island Press, 488 p.
Luzadis, V. A., Castello, L., Choi, J., Greenfield, E., Kim, S., Munsell, J., Nordman, E., Franco, C., and Olowabi, F., (2010), “The science of Ecological :Economics. A content analysis of Ecological Economics, 1989-2004”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185, p. 1-10.
Martínez-Alier, J., Jusmet, J.R., (2001), Economía Ecológica y Política Ambiental. México (D.F.): Fondo de Cultura Económica, 499 p.
Martínez-Alier, J., I. Ropke (ed.), (2008), Recent Developments in Ecological Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, 1352 p.
O’Connor, M., Spash, C., (ed.), (1999), Valuation and the Environment. Theory, Method and Practice, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Passet, R., (1996), L’économique et le vivant, second edition, Economica.
Røpke, I., (2004), “The Early History of Modern Ecological Economics”, Ecological Economics, 50, pp. 293-314.
Røpke, I., (2005), “Trends in the Development of Ecological Economics from the Late 1980s to the Early 2000s”, Ecological Economics, 55, pp. 262-290.
Söderbaum, P., (2000), Ecological Economics. A Political Economics Approach to Environment and Development. Earthscan, London.



This category has the following 6 subcategories, out of 6 total.






Pages in category "Ecological Economics"

The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 244 total.

(previous page) (next page)
(previous page) (next page)

Media in category "Ecological Economics"

The following 119 files are in this category, out of 119 total.