New Definitions of National Security: Difference between revisions
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:New_Definitions_of_National_Security '''@ GreenPolicy360: "New Definitions of National Security"'''] | [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:New_Definitions_of_National_Security '''@ GreenPolicy360: "New Definitions of National Security"'''] | ||
··················································································· | |||
<big><big>'''''2018/2017'''''</big></big> | |||
<big><big>'''<u>[[Nuclear Weapons]]</u>'''</big></big> | |||
* [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons '''Rethinking the Risks of Nuclear Weapons'''] | * [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons '''Rethinking the Risks of Nuclear Weapons'''] | ||
[[File:A Nuclear first use hearing.png]] | |||
····································································· | |||
| Line 41: | Line 48: | ||
······················································· | |||
Revision as of 18:01, 15 June 2018
GreenPolicy360 / New Horizons of Security
New Definitions of National & Global Security
- GreenPolicy360 & Strategic Demands / #StratDem
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ — Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
Environmental Security ↔ National Security
National Security: Enhanced via Environmental Security
@ Strategic Demands: "New Definitions of National Security"
@ GreenPolicy360: "New Definitions of National Security"
···················································································
2018/2017
·····································································
StratDem
- Visit GreenPolicy360's associate, Strategic Demands
·······················································
What is it there for, if it can’t be used?
— The US President
- ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
We Must Change from an Era of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)
- to a New Century of Work to Advance Nuclear Non-proliferation
- ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
We Must Change our Vision of Security to International Cooperation
Strategies of Survival, 'Eco-nomics' and Sustainable Progress
- Climate Change / Climate Science
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ --- Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
Responsibilities of Planet Citizens
SJS / GreenPolicy360 Siterunner:
Over the decades, in my political work, I have endeavored to develop "new definitions of national security."
In the late 1960s, inspired by the nascent moments of the modern environmental movement with images from an Apollo mission of the Earth rising from beyond the moon, a life-changing January 1969 cover of Life Magazine, and 'Whole Earth' realizations being shared for the first time, I began my involvement in larger strategic questions.
My initial political mentor George E. Brown and new relationships with thoughtful figures such as Dan Ellsberg at Rand Institute in Santa Monica brought insight into war and peace and challenged me.
The opportunity to become involved in the first Earth Day expanded my vision far beyond academic constraints and I began to explore connections between environmental security and international, global affairs.
Today the mission continues: To create a new security paradigm, a school of thought that identifies and advances contours of "real and resilient security".
- Security Brief prepared for the Green Institute by Roger Morris & Steven Schmidt
- Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ --- Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
Visit GreenPolicy's Associate -- Strategic Demands
US House of Representatives Says 'No' to Pentagon Prepping for Climate Impacts/Disruption
Republicans in US Congress Vote to Block National & Global Security
http://strategicdemands.com/nasa-pushes-earth-science-to-strengthen-security-capabilities/
Undercutting Security:
2015/16, US Congress Attempts to Cut Earth Science Research
"Republicans in the House and Senate don't want NASA studying Earth..."
Earth Science, NASA Climate Change Research Continues In Peril
"Slash and Burn Earth Sciences"
○
Funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs?
On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:
"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced...
The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth”—the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space.
NASA’s mission to observe, understand, and explore the solar system and the cosmos beyond has long been matched in importance by its mission to use the unrivaled vantage point of Earth orbit for looking downward, to better understand the only home that humanity currently has. It is difficult to understand why, at this time of U.S. leadership in both the outward-facing and inward-facing facets of NASA’s operations in space, the Congress would want to undermine that leadership and sacrifice the panoply of benefits it brings to the Nation."
Visit NASA Science @ GreenPolicy360
- Environmental Law
Environmental Protections Nationally and Globally
National Security & Environmental Security: Editorial Opinion from GreenPolicy's Associate, Strategic Demands
(@StrategicDemands)
Tag: Eco-nomics, a 21st Century paradigm in development @GreenPolicy360
○
Multi-Sum Security: Five Distinct Dimensions
Five discrete but overlapping dimensions of global security are discussed – including the oft-overlooked importance of transcultural security – to extend beyond the traditional, statecentric security paradigm.
Since the 1990s, there have been a number of attempts to broaden the conception of security beyond the purely state-centric model. A cooperative security concept was advanced in response to the realization that states needed to cooperate to tackle the multiple security challenges that were identified in the post-Cold War era. This concept suggested that national security was no longer just a national concern and called for enhanced cooperation between states.
http://www.css.ethz.ch/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/124192/pdf
○
"EnviroSecurity"
https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Envirosecurity
○
- About Us
- Additional Website Resources - Linked Data - Green Best Practices
- Atmospheric Science
- Climate Change
- Climate Policy
- Ecology Studies
- Eco-nomics
- Education
- Energy
- Environmental Protection
- Environmental Security
- Environmental Security, National Security
- Envirosecurity
- Global Security
- Green Energy Initiatives
- Green Politics
- Health
- NASA
- National Security
- Natural Resources
- New Definitions of National Security
- NOAA
- Nuclear Nonproliferation
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Nuclear Weapons
- Peace
- Planet Citizen
- Renewable Energy
- Resilience
- Sea-Level Rise & Mitigation
- Strategic Demands
- Sustainability Policies
- ThinBlueLayer
- US Environmental Protection Agency