Stats - Green Research & Science: Difference between revisions
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Our site attempts to be an e-resource that features accurate reporting that is factual and verifiable. | Our site attempts to be an e-resource that features accurate reporting that is factual and verifiable. | ||
In general, when discussing questions of environmental risks and environmental security, we | In general, when discussing questions of environmental risks and environmental security, we advocate the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principle "precautionary principle"]. | ||
The [http://www.stats.org/ Stats site] noted above is one of a number of online sources established to investigate claims made regarding environmental science. | The [http://www.stats.org/ Stats site] noted above is one of a number of online sources established to investigate claims made regarding environmental science. | ||
Revision as of 16:16, 21 November 2015
Stats.org - Scientific Research/Green News
GreenPolicy360:
As an eco-resource reporting in environmental fields, GreenPolicy360 looks to facts and 'good' science.
The goal of GreenPolicy360 is to provide accurate news, and information/data based upon scientific research.
Our site attempts to be an e-resource that features accurate reporting that is factual and verifiable.
In general, when discussing questions of environmental risks and environmental security, we advocate the "precautionary principle".
The Stats site noted above is one of a number of online sources established to investigate claims made regarding environmental science.
When posting content to the GreenPolicy wiki community we urge focusing on facts and science as it endeavors to provide policy and political guidance.
Within the rainbow of reporting of green/environmental science and eco-news, we welcome fact checking and reasoned discussion and debate.