New Definitions of National Security: Difference between revisions
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ | ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ | ||
; <big><big>Nuclear Weapons | ; <big><big>Nuclear Weapons — US Trillion Dollar Modernization/Expansion</big></big> | ||
; <big><big>Nuclear Proliferation ≠ Environmental Security </big></big> | ; <big><big>Nuclear Proliferation ≠ Environmental Security </big></big> |
Revision as of 12:49, 3 May 2015
- New Definitions of National & Global Security
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ
- Environmental Security ↔ National Security
National Security: Enhanced/Extended via Environmental Security Policy/Practices
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security
National Security: Placed at Risk by Undercutting Environmental Security Policy/Practives
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
- Environmental Security
http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security-2/
http://strategicdemands.com/resources/
http://strategicdemands.com/security-design/
http://strategicdemands.com/ground-truth/
http://strategicdemands.com/stratdem-factoid-re-road-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-national-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/speaking-environmental-security/
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Updates: April/May 2015
- Environmental Security: Earth Science Programs Cut
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Presidents_budget_see_earth_science.jpg
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:House_budget_see_earth_science.jpg
○
Re: funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs
On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:
"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced.
The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth” — the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space."
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
- Nuclear Weapons — US Trillion Dollar Modernization/Expansion
- Nuclear Proliferation ≠ Environmental Security
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons
http://strategicdemands.com/npt-treaty-at-risk/