New Definitions of National Security: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 64: Line 64:




○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


; <big><big>Nuclear Weapons -- US Trillion Dollar Modernization/Expansion</big></big>
; <big><big>Nuclear Weapons -- US Trillion Dollar Modernization/Expansion</big></big>

Revision as of 18:45, 1 May 2015

National-Security.001.png

Environment and Security.jpg

New Definitions of National & Global Security


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Environmental Security ↔ National Security

http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security

National Security: Enhanced/Extended via Environmental Security Policy/Practices

http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security

http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics


Nuclear Proliferation ≠ Environmental Security

http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Environmental Security Programs Cut

http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/

http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security-2/

http://strategicdemands.com/resources/

http://strategicdemands.com/security-design/

http://strategicdemands.com/ground-truth/

http://strategicdemands.com/stratdem-factoid-re-road-security/

http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-national-security/

http://strategicdemands.com/speaking-environmental-security/


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Updates: April/May 2015

http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Presidents_budget_see_earth_science.jpg

http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:House_budget_see_earth_science.jpg

Earth Science Research Budget Cuts Proposed

Re: funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs

On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:

"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced.

The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth”—the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space."


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Nuclear Weapons -- US Trillion Dollar Modernization/Expansion

http://strategicdemands.com/npt-treaty-at-risk/

http://strategicdemands.com/new-nuclear-arms-race/