New Definitions of National Security: Difference between revisions
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ | |||
'''Updates: April/May 2015''''' | '''Updates: April/May 2015''''' | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ | ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ | ||
; <big><big>Nuclear Weapons -- US Trillion Dollar Modernization/Expansion</big></big> | ; <big><big>Nuclear Weapons -- US Trillion Dollar Modernization/Expansion</big></big> |
Revision as of 18:44, 1 May 2015
- New Definitions of National & Global Security
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
- Environmental Security ↔ National Security
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security
National Security: Enhanced/Extended via Environmental Security Policy/Practices
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics
- Nuclear Proliferation ≠ Environmental Security
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Weapons
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
- Environmental Security Programs Cut
http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security-2/
http://strategicdemands.com/resources/
http://strategicdemands.com/security-design/
http://strategicdemands.com/ground-truth/
http://strategicdemands.com/stratdem-factoid-re-road-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-national-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/speaking-environmental-security/
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Updates: April/May 2015
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Presidents_budget_see_earth_science.jpg
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:House_budget_see_earth_science.jpg
Earth Science Research Budget Cuts Proposed
Re: funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs
On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:
"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced.
The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth”—the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space."
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
- Nuclear Weapons -- US Trillion Dollar Modernization/Expansion