User talk:Tsmith: Difference between revisions
(Curious your thoughts) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Why you removed this category: [http://www.greenpolicy.us/index.php?title=Category%3ACity&diff=4109&oldid=3885] - :-) Best, [[User:Mdilley|MarkDilley]] | Why you removed this category: [http://www.greenpolicy.us/index.php?title=Category%3ACity&diff=4109&oldid=3885] - :-) Best, [[User:Mdilley|MarkDilley]] | ||
== Response == | |||
I took your advice and renamed "City" as "City Governments". Me thinks cities like Portland, San Fran, Austin, Carrboro (NC), etc. should get a category tag of their very own -- like what you did with Portland -- and we can then categorize them under a category of "Cities", though that might be redundant with "City Governments".<br> | |||
[[User:Tsmith|Trey]] | |||
Revision as of 22:56, 25 January 2008
Hi Trey, just showing off the internal messaging system. ~~ MarkDilley
- you can sign your name with ~~~
- please test mine at User_talk:MarkDilley - thanks. ~~ MarkDilley
Exactly :-) ~~ MarkDilley
This is a great way to move around: Special:Recentchanges
Here is the http://flickr.com/groups/572250@N23/pool/ wiki interfaces flickr pool I was discussing. ~~ MarkDilley
Category question
Question on Category:City for you. Also, I like your thinking in the email, check out Special:Recentchanges to see some work I did to see if you like it or not. ~~ MarkDilley
Index
Hi Trey, thinking about the index looking like this - what do you think? If you don't like it, just revert to the your version, (edit and save). Best, MarkDilley
Curious your thoughts
Why you removed this category: [1] - :-) Best, MarkDilley
Response
I took your advice and renamed "City" as "City Governments". Me thinks cities like Portland, San Fran, Austin, Carrboro (NC), etc. should get a category tag of their very own -- like what you did with Portland -- and we can then categorize them under a category of "Cities", though that might be redundant with "City Governments".
Trey